Kałuzewski S, Sienicka J
Zakład Bakteriologii PZH w Warszawie.
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 1990;42(1-2):35-43.
Growth promoting properties and selectivity of 11 commercially produced media recommended for Salmonella and Shigella isolation were evaluated. The following media were tested: EMB (Eosin methylene blue agar), Endo, Płoskiriew, MacConkey, DC (Deoxycholate citrate agar), SS (Salmonella-Shigella agar), BS (Bismuth sulfite agar) and Mueller-Hinton as a medium with no selective properties. The media were produced in Czechoslovakia, East Germany, West Germany, Poland, and Soviet Union. Quantitative studies were performed on 71 strains representing 8 genera of Enterobacteriaceae family; both reference and wild newly + isolated from clinical material strains were included. It was found that none of DC and BS media provided suitable growth conditions for Shigella strains and in particular for S. dysenteriae, S. boydii, and S. flexneri. It was also found that the same medium (name and content) but derived from different producer can vary significantly in respect to growth promotion and selectivity especially for Shigella strains. All media with selective, differentiating properties for Salmonella and Shigella isolation should not be used without previous quantitative control test for their selective and growth promoting properties checked by user. The need for such a control performed both on reference and freshly isolated strains was shown in this study. In the set of control strains all species of Shigella should be represented.
对推荐用于分离沙门氏菌和志贺氏菌的11种商业生产培养基的促生长特性和选择性进行了评估。测试了以下培养基:伊红美蓝琼脂(EMB)、远藤氏培养基、普洛斯基列夫培养基、麦康凯培养基、脱氧胆酸盐柠檬酸盐琼脂(DC)、沙门氏菌-志贺氏菌琼脂(SS)、亚硫酸铋琼脂(BS)以及无选择性的穆勒-欣顿培养基。这些培养基分别产自捷克斯洛伐克、东德、西德、波兰和苏联。对代表肠杆菌科8个属的71株菌株进行了定量研究;其中包括参考菌株和从临床材料中新分离出的野生菌株。结果发现,DC和BS培养基均未为志贺氏菌菌株,尤其是痢疾志贺氏菌、鲍氏志贺氏菌和福氏志贺氏菌提供合适的生长条件。还发现,同一培养基(名称和成分相同)但产自不同生产商,其促生长和选择性,尤其是对志贺氏菌菌株的促生长和选择性可能会有显著差异。所有用于分离沙门氏菌和志贺氏菌且具有选择性、鉴别性的培养基,在未经用户事先对其选择性和促生长特性进行定量对照试验之前,均不应使用。本研究表明,对参考菌株和新分离菌株都需要进行这样的对照试验。在对照菌株组中,应包含所有志贺氏菌物种。