Community and Preventive Medicine; The James P. Wilmot Cancer Center; and the Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
J Oncol Pract. 2006 Mar;2(2):57-66. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2006.2.2.57.
Continuing androgen suppression is the current standard in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). An individualized strategy, wherein luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LH-RHas) are redosed when serum testosterone approaches a non-castrate level, may decrease costs without worsening outcomes. To understand possible outcomes, we performed a cost-utility analysis comparing individualized and fixed LH-RHa dosing strategies in men with AIPC.
The model used a societal perspective, a 5-year time horizon, and 3% annual cost discounting. The model accounted for direct costs of androgen suppression. Utilities were varied in accordance with published preference data.
Under base-case assumptions, individualized LH-RHa dosing yielded 1.089 expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), compared with 1.094 expected QALYs for fixed LH-RHa dosing. In cost analysis, lifetime per-patient costs for androgen suppression were estimated to be $5,694 for individualized LH-RHa dosing and $9,157 for fixed LH-RHa dosing. Applied to the total population, a strategy of individualized LH-RHa dosing would cost $170 million for androgen suppression, compared with $274 million for fixed LH-RHa dosing. Under these assumptions, adopting the individualized strategy resulted in $692,600 gained from a societal perspective for each QALY lost (the decremental cost utility).
The results suggest that an individualized LH-RHa dosing strategy would be associated with moderate savings on an individual basis but substantial savings on a population basis, and would not adversely affect quality of life or life expectancy. Further research is needed to establish the effects of this strategy on symptoms and survival, as well as patient satisfaction and true costs.
在雄激素非依赖性前列腺癌(AIPC)患者中,持续雄激素抑制是目前的标准治疗方法。一种个体化策略,即当血清睾酮接近去势水平时重新给予黄体生成素释放激素激动剂(LH-RHa),可能会降低成本而不会使结局恶化。为了了解可能的结果,我们进行了一项成本效益分析,比较了 AIPC 男性中个体化和固定 LH-RHa 剂量策略。
该模型采用了社会视角,5 年时间范围和 3%的年度成本贴现。该模型考虑了雄激素抑制的直接成本。效用根据已发表的偏好数据进行了变化。
在基本假设下,个体化 LH-RHa 剂量方案预计可获得 1.089 个预期质量调整生命年(QALY),而固定 LH-RHa 剂量方案预计可获得 1.094 个预期 QALY。在成本分析中,预计个体化 LH-RHa 剂量方案的每位患者终生雄激素抑制治疗费用为 5694 美元,而固定 LH-RHa 剂量方案为 9157 美元。应用于总体人群,个体化 LH-RHa 剂量方案的雄激素抑制治疗费用为 1.7 亿美元,而固定 LH-RHa 剂量方案为 2.74 亿美元。在这些假设下,从社会角度来看,采用个体化策略可使每损失 1 个 QALY 获得 692600 美元的收益(增量成本效用)。
结果表明,个体化 LH-RHa 剂量策略在个体基础上可能会有适度节省,但在人群基础上会有大量节省,并且不会对生活质量或预期寿命产生不利影响。需要进一步研究来确定该策略对症状和生存的影响,以及患者满意度和实际成本。