International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, and the University of Amsterdam.
J Peasant Stud. 2010;37(4):593-607. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512449.
This article considers the global expansion of agrofuels feedstock production from a political economy perspective. It considers and dismisses the environmental and pro-poor developmental justifications attached to agrofuels. To local populations and direct producers, the specific destination of the crop as fuel, food, cosmetics or other final uses in faraway places is probably of less interest than the forms of (direct or indirect) appropriation of their land and the forms of their insertion or exclusion as producers in global commodity chains. Global demand for both agrofuels and food is stimulating new forms (or the resurgence of old forms) of corporate land grabbing and expropriation, and of incorporation of smallholders in contracted production. Drawing both on recent studies on agrofuels expansion and on the political economy literature on agrarian transition and capitalism in agriculture, this article raises the question whether "agrofuels capitalism" is in any way essentially different from other forms of capitalist agrarian monocrop production, and in turn whether the agrarian transitions involved require new tools of analysis.
本文从政治经济学的角度考虑了全球范围内生物燃料原料生产的扩张。它考虑并摒弃了与生物燃料相关的环境和有利于穷人的发展理由。对于当地居民和直接生产者来说,他们可能不太关心作物作为燃料、食品、化妆品或其他最终用途在遥远地方的具体用途,而更关心的是他们的土地被(直接或间接)侵占的形式以及他们作为生产者被纳入或排除在全球商品链中的形式。对生物燃料和粮食的全球需求正在刺激新的形式(或旧形式的复兴)的公司土地掠夺和没收,以及小农户在合同生产中的纳入。本文既借鉴了最近关于生物燃料扩张的研究,也借鉴了关于农业土地转型和资本主义的政治经济学文献,提出了这样一个问题:“生物燃料资本主义”在任何方面是否与其他形式的资本主义农业单一作物生产有本质区别,以及所涉及的农业转型是否需要新的分析工具。