• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婚姻困扰与精神卫生保健服务的利用。

Marital distress and mental health care service utilization.

机构信息

Brown University Medical School.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Oct;78(5):732-6. doi: 10.1037/a0019711.

DOI:10.1037/a0019711
PMID:20873908
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to evaluate the association between marital distress and mental health service utilization in a population-based sample of men and women (N = 1,601).

METHOD

The association between marital distress and mental health care service utilization was evaluated for overall mental health service utilization and for specific sectors of treatment providers, including psychiatrist, other mental health provider, other medical provider, and religious services provider. Interviews were used to assess past-year service utilization and presence of anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders.

RESULTS

Approximately 12% of married individuals sought help for problems with their emotions, nerves, or substance use during the 12 months preceding the interview. Marital distress was significantly associated with (a) overall mental health service utilization and service utilization provided by each of the sectors of providers when controlling for demographic variables and (b) overall mental health service utilization and receiving treatment from a psychiatrist when additionally controlling for past-year anxiety, mood, or substance use disorders. There was little evidence that the associations between marital distress and service utilization were moderated by gender or presence of psychiatric disorders.

CONCLUSION

The finding that marital distress is associated with greater mental health care service utilization suggests that clinicians should assess both individual and relationship factors among individuals presenting for treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估婚姻困扰与心理健康服务利用之间的关系,该研究基于人群对男性和女性(N=1601)进行了调查。

方法

评估了婚姻困扰与心理健康服务利用之间的关系,包括整体心理健康服务利用以及特定治疗提供者部门的利用,包括精神科医生、其他心理健康提供者、其他医疗提供者和宗教服务提供者。访谈用于评估过去一年的服务利用情况以及焦虑、情绪和物质使用障碍的存在情况。

结果

大约 12%的已婚人士在接受访谈前的 12 个月内因情绪、神经或物质使用问题寻求帮助。婚姻困扰与(a)整体心理健康服务利用以及控制人口统计学变量后每个提供者部门提供的服务利用显著相关,以及(b)整体心理健康服务利用以及在另外控制过去一年焦虑、情绪或物质使用障碍后接受精神科医生治疗显著相关。婚姻困扰与服务利用之间的关联几乎没有证据表明受性别或精神障碍存在的调节。

结论

婚姻困扰与更多心理健康服务利用相关的发现表明,临床医生在为接受治疗的个体提供治疗时,应该评估个体和关系因素。

相似文献

1
Marital distress and mental health care service utilization.婚姻困扰与精神卫生保健服务的利用。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Oct;78(5):732-6. doi: 10.1037/a0019711.
2
Social phobia in Finnish general adolescent population: prevalence, comorbidity, individual and family correlates, and service use.芬兰普通青少年群体中的社交恐惧症:患病率、共病情况、个体及家庭相关因素,以及服务利用情况。
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(6):528-36. doi: 10.1002/da.20422.
3
Use of health services for major depressive and anxiety disorders in Finland.芬兰针对重度抑郁症和焦虑症的医疗服务使用情况。
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(1):27-37. doi: 10.1002/da.20256.
4
Treatment utilization and satisfaction: examining the contributions of Axis II psychopathology and the Five-Factor Model of personality.治疗利用与满意度:审视轴II精神病理学和人格五因素模型的作用。
J Pers Disord. 2006 Aug;20(4):369-87. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.4.369.
5
Utilization of mental health services and risk of 12-month problematic alcohol use.心理健康服务的利用与12个月内出现问题饮酒的风险
Am J Health Behav. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):392-401. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.4.392.
6
Receipt of preventive medical care and medical screening for patients with mental illness: a comparative analysis.接受预防医疗保健和精神疾病患者的医疗筛查:比较分析。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Sep-Oct;32(5):519-43. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
7
Treatment adequacy of anxiety and depressive disorders: primary versus specialised care in Spain.焦虑症和抑郁症的治疗充分性:西班牙的初级护理与专科护理对比
J Affect Disord. 2006 Nov;96(1-2):9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
8
Prospective association of anxiety, depressive, and addictive disorders with high utilization of primary, specialty and emergency medical care.焦虑症、抑郁症和成瘾性障碍与初级、专科和急诊医疗高利用率之间的前瞻性关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2145-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.017.
9
Comorbidity in generalized anxiety disorder: impact and implications.广泛性焦虑障碍中的共病:影响与意义。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 Suppl 11:29-34; discussion 35-6.
10
Late-life anxiety disorders among Puerto Rican primary care patients: impact on well-being, functioning, and service utilization.波多黎各初级保健患者的晚年焦虑症:对幸福感、功能和服务利用的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2004;18(6):841-58. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2003.10.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived partner responsiveness alters the association between marital distress and well-being in dementia spousal caregivers.配偶的感知反应性会改变痴呆症患者配偶照顾者的婚姻困扰与幸福感之间的关联。
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2024 Oct 18;20:100271. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2024.100271. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Adverse childhood experiences, marital status and depressive symptoms in later life among the Chinese middle-aged and older adults : the mediating role of marital status.中国中老年人群中童年逆境经历、婚姻状况与晚年抑郁症状的关系:婚姻状况的中介作用
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 19;24(1):2246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19787-x.
3
Empathy and Romantic Relationship Quality among Cohabitating Couples: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.
同居伴侣间的同理心与浪漫关系质量:一种行为者-伴侣相互依赖模型
Fam J Alex Va. 2017 Jul;25(3):208-214. doi: 10.1177/1066480717710644. Epub 2017 May 22.
4
"Go See Somebody": How Spouses Promote Mental Health Care.“去看医生”:配偶如何促进心理健康护理。
Soc Ment Health. 2020 Mar;10(1):80-96. doi: 10.1177/2156869319834335. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
High sensitivity and specificity screening for clinically significant intimate partner violence.高灵敏度和特异性筛选具有临床意义的亲密伴侣暴力。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Feb;35(1):80-91. doi: 10.1037/fam0000781. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Mechanisms of change in a brief, online relationship intervention.简短在线关系干预中改变的机制。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):57-67. doi: 10.1037/fam0000569. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
Self-reporting DSM-5/ICD-11 clinically significant intimate partner violence and child abuse: Convergent and response process validity.DSM-5/ICD-11 自我报告的临床显著亲密伴侣暴力和儿童虐待:聚合和反应过程有效性。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):101-111. doi: 10.1037/fam0000560. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
8
A case-controlled field study evaluating ICD-11 proposals for relational problems and intimate partner violence.一项评估国际疾病分类第11版中关于关系问题和亲密伴侣暴力提议的病例对照实地研究。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 May-Aug;18(2):113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
9
Comprehensive determinants of health service utilisation for mental health reasons in a Canadian catchment area.加拿大一个集水区内心理健康服务利用的综合决定因素。
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Apr 2;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-20.