Suppr超能文献

在缺血性事件发生之前,抑酸药物的使用增加:近期观察性研究中潜在的混杂因素。

Increased use of acid-suppressing drugs before the occurrence of ischemic events: a potential source of confounding in recent observational studies.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Oct;30(10):985-93. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.10.985.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if the use of acid-suppressing drugs is increased before the occurrence of ischemic events.

DESIGN

Population-based, nested case-control analysis.

DATA SOURCE

Administrative databases in Saskatchewan, Canada.

PATIENTS

Cases were 1612 patients (aged ≥ 40 yrs) who started a first-ever antihypertensive drug between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2003, and were hospitalized for a first ischemic heart event of either myocardial infarction (1002 patients) or unstable angina (610 patients); five control patients were matched to each case patient by age, sex, and year of first antihypertensive prescription (8060 controls).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Within the case and control groups, we calculated exposure to acid-suppressing therapy, defined as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine(2)-receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs), within 90 days leading up to the event. Exposure to acid-suppressing therapy was higher among cases than controls (15.3% [246/1612] vs 10.4% [837/8060], adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.49, p<0.009). Exposure to each acid suppressant was similarly higher among cases than controls: H(2)RA users (11.7% [188/1612] vs 8.4% [678/8060], AOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.46, p<0.048) and PPI users (4.0% [64/1612] vs 2.2% [179/8060], AOR 1.32, 95% CI 0.95-1.84, p=0.094). Use of other drugs was also significantly increased during this period.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of acid-suppressing drugs increased before the occurrence of ischemic events regardless of the type (PPI or H(2)RA) or whether other drugs, such as clopidogrel, were concurrently administered. In addition, significant increases in overall drug use were observed during this time frame, suggesting that many patients exhibit warning signs before an acute hospitalization. Thus, PPI use before the occurrence of ischemic events may simply be a marker of unmeasured and uncontrolled confounding in observational studies that have implicated a PPI-clopidogrel interaction as a cause of recurrent ischemic events.

摘要

研究目的

确定在发生缺血性事件之前是否会增加使用抑酸药物。

设计

基于人群的巢式病例对照分析。

数据来源

加拿大萨斯喀彻温省的行政数据库。

患者

病例为 1612 名(年龄≥40 岁)患者,他们于 1994 年 1 月 1 日至 2003 年 12 月 31 日期间首次开始使用一种降压药物,因首次发生心肌梗死(1002 例)或不稳定型心绞痛(610 例)而住院的第一例缺血性心脏病事件;每例病例患者匹配 5 名年龄、性别和首次使用降压药物年份相同的对照患者(8060 名对照)。

测量和主要结果

在病例和对照组中,我们计算了在事件发生前 90 天内使用抑酸治疗的情况,定义为质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)或组胺 2 受体拮抗剂(H2RAs)。与对照组相比,病例组中使用抑酸治疗的比例更高(15.3%[1612 例中的 246 例] vs 10.4%[8060 例中的 837 例],调整后的优势比[AOR]为 1.26,95%置信区间[CI]为 1.06-1.49,p<0.009)。与对照组相比,使用每种抑酸剂的病例组也更高:H2RA 使用者(11.7%[1612 例中的 188 例] vs 8.4%[8060 例中的 678 例],AOR 为 1.21,95%CI 为 1.00-1.46,p<0.048)和 PPI 使用者(4.0%[1612 例中的 64 例] vs 2.2%[8060 例中的 179 例],AOR 为 1.32,95%CI 为 0.95-1.84,p=0.094)。在此期间,其他药物的使用也显著增加。

结论

在发生缺血性事件之前,使用抑酸药物的情况增加,无论使用的是 PPI 还是 H2RA 类药物,或者是否同时使用了其他药物,如氯吡格雷。此外,在此期间观察到总体药物使用量显著增加,表明许多患者在急性住院前出现了警告信号。因此,在发生缺血性事件之前使用 PPI 可能只是观察性研究中未测量和未控制混杂因素的一个标志,这些研究表明 PPI-氯吡格雷相互作用是复发性缺血性事件的原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验