Black A
American Ethnic Studies Department, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1990 Winter;20(4):285-306.
This paper takes exception to much of the literature on Jonestown. The authors of this literature claim that an explanation of the mass suicide in Jonestown requires an understanding of how its residents came to a common consciousness. Such an analysis implies that the residents of Jonestown died for essentially the same reason. This paper, using Durkheim's typology of suicides, demonstrates that the residents of Jonestown died for very different reasons and that two types of suicide occurred simultaneously on November 18, 1978: altruistic and fatalistic. Some of the residents of Jonestown died because they put the group above the self; they committed altruistic suicide. The majority, however, died for fatalistic reasons. Jonestown in fact had become a hopeless, demeaning, and antagonistic environment. The analysis here suggests caution to those who assume that a mass suicide is necessarily a homogeneous event.
本文对许多关于琼斯镇的文献提出异议。这些文献的作者声称,要解释琼斯镇的集体自杀事件,需要理解其居民是如何形成共同意识的。这种分析意味着琼斯镇的居民基本上是出于相同的原因死亡。本文运用涂尔干的自杀类型学,表明琼斯镇的居民死亡原因截然不同,且在1978年11月18日同时发生了两种类型的自杀:利他型和宿命型。琼斯镇的一些居民死亡是因为他们将集体置于个人之上,他们实施了利他型自杀。然而,大多数人是出于宿命论的原因死亡。事实上,琼斯镇已经变成了一个绝望、屈辱和敌对的环境。这里的分析提醒那些认为集体自杀必然是一个同质化事件的人要谨慎。