Department of Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;24(3):323-8. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000300011.
The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the superficial dentin pattern of primary teeth after applying different phosphoric acid concentrations and conditioning times. Twenty-four dentin surfaces were divided in 4 groups with 10 teeth each: GI -no treatment; GII to GIV -phosphoric acid at 37%, 32%, and 10% respectively. The samples were divided into two halves: one treated for 7 seconds (T1) and the other one for 15 seconds (T2). They were submitted to scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). A reticule was superimposed upon the images to randomly select dentinal tubules measured in µm². The conditioning times did not cause significant differences in the mean diameter values of the dentin tubules within each test group: GII (T1= 4.86; T2= 4.70); GIII (T1 = 3.83; T2= 3.08); GIV (T1= 5.04; T2= 5.23). Comparing different groups, there were no differences in T1. The same results were observed in T2, except for GIV which presented higher mean diameter values than GIII. The extent of acid conditioning did not influence tubule opening within groups. When different types of acids where compared, only the 10% phosphoric acid showed upper tubule opening than 32% phosphoric acid. The dentin pattern varied according to the type of acid used for conditioning.
本研究旨在评估不同浓度磷酸酸蚀和不同酸蚀时间对乳牙浅表层牙本质形态的影响。24 个牙本质表面被分为 4 组,每组 10 个牙齿:GI-无处理;GII-GIV 分别用 37%、32%和 10%的磷酸处理。样本被分为两半:一半处理 7 秒(T1),另一半处理 15 秒(T2)。它们被提交给扫描电子显微镜(SEM)。在图像上叠加一个网格,以随机选择µm² 测量的牙本质小管。在每个测试组内,处理时间并未导致牙本质小管的平均直径值有显著差异:GII(T1=4.86;T2=4.70);GIII(T1=3.83;T2=3.08);GIV(T1=5.04;T2=5.23)。比较不同组时,T1 没有差异。T2 也是如此,除了 GIV 组的平均直径值高于 GIII 组。酸处理的程度并没有影响组内的小管开口。当比较不同类型的酸时,只有 10%的磷酸酸蚀剂显示出比 32%的磷酸酸蚀剂更大的小管开口。牙本质形态根据用于酸蚀的酸的类型而变化。