Reicherts M, Perrez M
Psychologisches Institut, Universität Freiburg/Schweiz, Fribourg.
Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother. 1990;38(4):324-33.
The influence of repression-sensitization as a two-dimensional concept (trait anxiety and defensiveness) on stress and coping behavior in daily life is studied. N = 60 students were trained to use a computer-aided self-observation system (COMES) and to protocol their stressful episodes. The results reveal only few effects of the 4 defense modes (assessed by STAI trait anxiety and social desirability scale SDS) on stress and coping behavior in the field: Sensitizers recorded more negative emotions and stronger connections between their stressful episodes. There were no differences in reported coping tendencies (e.g. control of attention) and effectiveness. During self-observation, repressors slightly changed their behavior toward non-defensiveness, a possible effect of self-observation specific to the defense mode. In general, we observed only few changes in the course of the self-observation which can be interpreted as reactivity effects of the method. The results are discussed in the light of the R-S concept referring to daily life stressors and in relation to different assessment methods (questionnaires vs. trained self-observation in the field).
本研究探讨了作为二维概念(特质焦虑和防御性)的压抑-敏感化对日常生活中压力及应对行为的影响。60名学生接受培训,学会使用计算机辅助自我观察系统(COMES)并记录他们的压力事件。结果显示,4种防御模式(通过状态-特质焦虑量表[STAI]特质焦虑和社会赞许性量表[SDS]评估)对实际生活中的压力和应对行为仅有少量影响:敏感者记录到更多负面情绪,且其压力事件之间的联系更强。在报告的应对倾向(如注意力控制)和效果方面没有差异。在自我观察期间,压抑者的行为向非防御性略有改变,这可能是特定于防御模式的自我观察效应。总体而言,我们在自我观察过程中仅观察到少量变化,这些变化可解释为该方法的反应性效应。研究结果结合压抑-敏感化概念,针对日常生活压力源,并与不同评估方法(问卷调查与实际生活中的培训自我观察)进行了讨论。