Suppr超能文献

根据基线血压评估降压效果和不同降压方案对主要心血管事件的影响:随机试验的荟萃分析。

The effects of blood pressure reduction and of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events according to baseline blood pressure: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

机构信息

The George Institute, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2011 Jan;29(1):4-16. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834000be.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefits of reducing blood pressure are well established, but there remains uncertainty about whether the magnitude of the effect varies with the initial blood pressure level. The objective was to compare the risk reductions achieved by different blood pressure-lowering regimens among individuals with different baseline blood pressures.

METHODS

Thirty-two randomized controlled trials were included and seven comparisons between different types of treatments were made. For each comparison, the primary prespecified analysis included calculation of summary estimates of effect using random-effects meta-analysis for major cardiovascular events in four groups defined by baseline SBP (<140, 140-159, 160-179, and ≥ 180 mmHg).

RESULTS

There were 201 566 participants among whom 20 079 primary outcome events were observed. There was no evidence of differences in the proportionate risk reductions achieved with different blood pressure-lowering regimens across groups defined according to higher or lower levels of baseline SBP (all P for trend > 0.17). This finding was broadly consistent for comparisons of different regimens, for DBP categories, and for commonly used blood pressure cut-points.

CONCLUSION

It appears unlikely that the effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering treatments depends substantively upon starting blood pressure level. As the majority of patients in the trials contributing to these overviews had a history of hypertension or were receiving background blood pressure-lowering therapy, the findings suggest that additional blood pressure reduction in hypertensive patients meeting initial blood pressure targets will produce further benefits. More broadly, the data are supportive of the utilization of blood pressure-lowering regimens in high-risk patients with and without hypertension.

摘要

背景

降低血压的益处已得到充分证实,但对于血压初始水平不同时,降压效果的幅度是否存在差异仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在比较不同降压方案在不同基线血压人群中所带来的风险降低幅度。

方法

纳入了 32 项随机对照试验,并对 7 种不同类型的治疗方案进行了比较。对于每种比较,主要的预先指定分析包括使用随机效应荟萃分析计算主要心血管事件的汇总效应估计值,将基线 SBP(<140、140-159、160-179 和≥180mmHg)的四个组定义为不同的组别。

结果

共有 201566 名参与者,其中观察到 20079 例主要结局事件。在根据基线 SBP 较高或较低水平定义的不同组别中,不同降压方案所实现的风险降低幅度之间没有差异(所有趋势 P 值均>0.17)。这一发现对于不同方案的比较、DBP 类别以及常用的血压切点均具有广泛的一致性。

结论

似乎不太可能降压治疗的有效性主要取决于起始血压水平。由于这些综述中大多数试验的患者都有高血压病史或正在接受背景降压治疗,因此这一发现表明,在符合初始血压目标的高血压患者中进一步降低血压将带来进一步的获益。更广泛地说,这些数据支持在有或没有高血压的高危患者中使用降压方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验