• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术会增加手术切缘阳性和生化进展的风险吗?

Does nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy increase the risk of positive surgical margins and biochemical progression?

作者信息

Alkhateeb Sultan Saud, Alibhai Shabbir M, Finelli Antonio, Fleshner Neil E, Jewett Michael A, Zlotta Alexandre R, Trachtenberg John

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2010 May;2(2):58-62. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.65107.

DOI:10.4103/0974-7796.65107
PMID:20882155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2943681/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP), there have been concerns about the increased risks of positive surgical margins (PSM) and biochemical progression (BP). We examined the relationship of NSRP with PSM and BP using a large, mature dataset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer at our center between 1997 and 2008 were identified. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. We examined the relation of NSRP to the rate of PSM and BP in univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for clinical and pathological variables including age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and doubling time, and pathological stage and grade.

RESULTS

In total, 856 patients were included, 70.9% underwent NSRP and 29.1% had non-NSRP. PSM rates were 13.5% in the NSRP group compared to 17.7% in non-NSRP (P=0.11). In a multivariate analysis, non-NSRP was preformed in patients with a higher pathological stage (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.25-3.04, P=0.003) and a higher baseline PSA level (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, P=0.005). With a median follow-up of 41 months, BP-free survival was 88% for non-NSRP compared to 92% for the NSRP group (log rank P=0.018); this difference was not significant in a multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.28-1.06, P=0.09).

CONCLUSION

When used in properly selected patients, NSRP does not seem to increase the risk of PSM and disease progression. The most effective way of resolving this issue is through a randomized clinical trial; however, such a trial is not feasible.

摘要

背景

自引入保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术(NSRP)以来,人们一直担心手术切缘阳性(PSM)和生化进展(BP)风险增加。我们使用一个大型、成熟的数据集研究了NSRP与PSM和BP之间的关系。

材料与方法

确定1997年至2008年期间在我们中心接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌的患者。排除接受新辅助治疗的患者。我们在单变量和多变量分析中研究了NSRP与PSM率和BP的关系,并对包括年龄、治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和倍增时间以及病理分期和分级在内的临床和病理变量进行了调整。

结果

总共纳入856例患者,70.9%接受了NSRP,29.1%接受了非NSRP。NSRP组的PSM率为13.5%,而非NSRP组为17.7%(P = 0.11)。在多变量分析中,病理分期较高(HR 1.95,95%CI 1.25 - 3.04,P = 0.003)和基线PSA水平较高(HR 1.04,95%CI 1.01 - 1.08,P = 0.005)的患者接受了非NSRP。中位随访41个月,非NSRP组的无BP生存率为88%,而NSRP组为92%(对数秩检验P = 0.018);在多变量Cox回归分析中,这种差异不显著(HR 0.54,95%CI 0.28 - 1.06,P = 0.09)。

结论

在适当选择的患者中使用时,NSRP似乎不会增加PSM和疾病进展的风险。解决这个问题的最有效方法是通过随机临床试验;然而,这样的试验不可行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b7/2943681/cbaa6c934dc1/UA-2-58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b7/2943681/cbaa6c934dc1/UA-2-58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b7/2943681/cbaa6c934dc1/UA-2-58-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Does nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy increase the risk of positive surgical margins and biochemical progression?保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术会增加手术切缘阳性和生化进展的风险吗?
Urol Ann. 2010 May;2(2):58-62. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.65107.
2
Incidence of positive surgical margins after biopsy-selected nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.活检选择的保留神经根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性的发生率。
Urology. 1998 Mar;51(3):437-42. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00608-0.
3
Oncological outcomes after attempted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer are comparable to standard non-NSRP: a longitudinal long-term propensity-matched single-centre study.高风险前列腺癌患者行保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术(NSRP)后的肿瘤学结果与标准非 NSRP 相当:一项纵向长期倾向匹配的单中心研究。
BJU Int. 2024 Jan;133(1):53-62. doi: 10.1111/bju.16126. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
[Oncological safety of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of histopathological outcomes and recurrence-free survival].[保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学安全性:组织病理学结果及无复发生存率评估]
Urologiia. 2020 Apr(2):60-64.
5
[Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy--effect and risks].保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术——效果与风险
Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Aug 18;170(34):2549-54.
6
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
7
Risk factors associated with positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: can nerve-sparing surgery increase the risk?临床局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性的相关危险因素:保留神经手术会增加风险吗?
Scand J Urol. 2014 Feb;48(1):15-20. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.749425. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
8
Health-related quality of life in long-term prostate cancer survivors after nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy-Results from the multiregional PROCAS study.长期前列腺癌幸存者中神经保留与非神经保留根治性前列腺切除术后的健康相关生活质量:来自多区域 PROCAS 研究的结果。
Cancer Med. 2020 Aug;9(15):5416-5424. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3197. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
Factors Affecting Surgical Margin Positivity after Radical Prostatectomy in the Turkish Population: A Multicenter Study of the Urooncology Association.土耳其人群行根治性前列腺切除术切缘阳性的影响因素:泌尿肿瘤学协会的多中心研究。
Urol Int. 2020;104(9-10):724-730. doi: 10.1159/000507268. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
10
Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease risk group.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的影响因疾病风险组而异。
J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.132.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative characteristics of the P.R.O.S.T.A.T.E. scores: a novel predictive tool for the risk of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.前列腺评分(P.R.O.S.T.A.T.E.)的术前特征:一种预测根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性风险的新型工具。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr;143(4):687-692. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2313-2. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
2
Determinants and effects of positive surgical margins after prostatectomy on prostate cancer mortality: a population-based study.前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺癌死亡率的影响因素及效应:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Urol. 2014 Nov 5;14:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-86.
3
Treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in health utilities and health-related quality of life over 12 months following radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后12个月内健康效用和健康相关生活质量的变化。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Dec;3(6):445-52. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1171.
2
Impact of nerve sparing on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence: results from the SEARCH database.保留神经对手术切缘和生化复发的影响:来自SEARCH数据库的结果。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2009;12(2):172-6. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2008.40. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
3
Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy--does it have an impact on urinary continence?
局限性前列腺癌的治疗选择。
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Dec;59(12):1269-74.
保留神经的开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术——对尿失禁有影响吗?
J Urol. 2006 Jul;176(1):189-95. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00574-X.
4
Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待对比
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043739.
5
Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure.根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中保留神经(NS)手术对切缘状态和生化复发的影响。
Eur Urol. 2005 Feb;47(2):176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.09.002.
6
The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.手术方式(保留神经束与广泛局部切除)对根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘及生化复发的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1328-32. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000138681.64035.dc.
7
Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.早期局限性前列腺癌的自然病史。
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2713-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2713.
8
Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.根治性前列腺切除标本中,不同外科医生的手术切缘阳性率存在差异。
J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 1):2292-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091100.83725.51.
9
Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中的阳性手术切缘:尖部解剖、膀胱颈重塑及神经保留的影响
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2049-52. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000065822.15012.b7.
10
Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 1;20(7):1853-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.07.069.