Orzalesi Marcello
Fondazione Maruzza Lefebvre D'Ovidio Onlus, Via del Nuoto 11, Rome, Italy.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Oct;23 Suppl 3:7-10. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.510647.
Recent progress in neonatal care has greatly improved the prognosis and the probabilities of survival in very sick or very preterm neonates and has modified the concept and limits of the so called viability. However, in some circumstances, when the death of the baby can only be postponed temporarily, at the price of severe suffering, or when survival is associated with severe disabilities and an intolerable life for the child and the family, then it might not be appropriate to utilize all the armamentarium of neonatal intensive care. In such circumstances, limitation of intensive treatments (withholding or withdrawal) generally invasive and painful, could represent a more human and reasonable alternative. The ethical principles underlying those decisions, the most frequent situations occurring in practice, the role of parents in the decision-making process, and the opinions and behavior of neonatologists from many European intensive care units will be examined and discussed.
新生儿护理方面的最新进展极大地改善了病情严重或早产程度极高的新生儿的预后和存活几率,并改变了所谓生存能力的概念和界限。然而,在某些情况下,若婴儿的死亡只能以严重痛苦为代价暂时推迟,或者生存伴随着严重残疾以及对孩子和家庭而言无法忍受的生活,那么使用新生儿重症监护的所有手段可能并不合适。在这种情况下,限制通常具有侵入性且痛苦的强化治疗( withholding或withdrawal)可能是一种更人道且合理的选择。将对这些决策背后的伦理原则、实践中最常见的情况、父母在决策过程中的作用以及来自许多欧洲重症监护病房的新生儿科医生的意见和行为进行审视和讨论。