Pain Management Research Institute, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards NSW 2065, Australia Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia Health Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3083, Australia Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Pain. 2011 Feb;152(2):259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.007.
α-Conotoxins that are thought to act as antagonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) containing α3-subunits are efficacious in several preclinical models of chronic pain. Potent interactions of Vc1.1 with other targets have suggested that the pain-relieving actions of α-conotoxins might be mediated by either α9α10 nAChRs or a novel GABA(B) receptor-mediated inhibition of N-type calcium channels. Here we establish that three α-conotoxins, Vc1.1, AuIB and MII have distinct selectivity profiles for these three potential targets. Their potencies after intramuscular administration were then determined for reversal of allodynia produced by partial nerve ligation in rats. Vc1.1, which potently inhibits α9α10 nAChRs and GABA(B)/Ca(2+) channels but weakly blocks α3β2 and α3β4 nAChRs, produced potent, long-lasting reversal of allodynia that were prevented by pre-treatment with the GABA(B) receptor antagonist, SCH50911. α-Conotoxin AuIB, a weak α3β4 nAChR antagonist, inhibited GABA(B)/Ca(2+) channels but did not act on α9α10 nAChRs. AuIB also produced reversal of allodynia. These findings suggest that GABA(B) receptor-dependent inhibition of N-type Ca(2+) channels can mediate the sustained anti-allodynic actions of some α-conotoxins. However, MII, a potent α3β2 nAChR antagonist but inactive on α9α10 and α3β4 nAChRs and GABA(B)/Ca(2+) channels, was demonstrated to have short-acting anti-allodynic action. This suggests that α3β2 nAChRs may also contribute to reversal of allodynia. Together, these findings suggest that inhibition of α9α10 nAChR is neither necessary nor sufficient for relief of allodynia and establish that α-conotoxins selective for GABA(B) receptor-dependent inhibition of N-type Ca(2+) channels relieve allodynia, and could therefore be developed to manage chronic pain.
α- 芋螺毒素被认为是烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体(nAChRs)的拮抗剂,其中包含 α3 亚基,在几种慢性疼痛的临床前模型中都具有疗效。Vc1.1 与其他靶点的强烈相互作用表明,α-芋螺毒素的止痛作用可能是通过 α9α10 nAChRs 或新型 GABA(B)受体介导的 N 型钙通道抑制来介导的。在这里,我们确定了三种 α-芋螺毒素,Vc1.1、AuIB 和 MII,它们对这三个潜在靶点具有不同的选择性。然后,通过肌内给予这些毒素,测定它们逆转大鼠部分神经结扎引起的痛觉过敏的效力。Vc1.1 强烈抑制 α9α10 nAChRs 和 GABA(B)/Ca(2+)通道,但对 α3β2 和 α3β4 nAChRs 的抑制作用较弱,能产生有效的、持久的痛觉过敏逆转,这种作用被 GABA(B)受体拮抗剂 SCH50911 预处理所阻断。α-芋螺毒素 AuIB 是一种弱的 α3β4 nAChR 拮抗剂,抑制 GABA(B)/Ca(2+)通道,但不作用于 α9α10 nAChRs。AuIB 也能产生痛觉过敏的逆转。这些发现表明,GABA(B)受体依赖性 N 型 Ca(2+)通道抑制可介导某些 α-芋螺毒素的持续抗痛觉过敏作用。然而,MII 是一种有效的 α3β2 nAChR 拮抗剂,但对 α9α10 和 α3β4 nAChRs 以及 GABA(B)/Ca(2+)通道无活性,被证明具有短暂的抗痛觉过敏作用。这表明 α3β2 nAChRs 也可能有助于痛觉过敏的逆转。综上所述,这些发现表明,抑制 α9α10 nAChR 既不是缓解痛觉过敏的必要条件,也不是充分条件,并证实了选择性抑制 GABA(B)受体依赖性 N 型 Ca(2+)通道的 α-芋螺毒素可缓解痛觉过敏,因此可以开发用于治疗慢性疼痛。