School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Syst Biol. 2010 Dec;59(6):723-40. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq055. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
Rates of phenotypic evolution derive from numerous interrelated processes acting at varying spatial and temporal scales and frequently differ substantially among lineages. Although current models employed in reconstructing ancestral character states permit independent rates for distinct types of transition (forward and reverse transitions and transitions between different states), these rates are typically assumed to be identical for all branches in a phylogeny. In this paper, I present a general model of character evolution enabling rate heterogeneity among branches. This model is employed in assessing the extent to which the assumption of uniform transition rates affects reconstructions of ancestral limb morphology in the scincid lizard clade Lerista and, accordingly, the potential for rate variability to mislead inferences of evolutionary patterns. Permitting rate variation among branches significantly improves model fit for both the manus and the pes. A constrained model in which the rate of digit acquisition is assumed to be effectively zero is strongly supported in each case; when compared with a model assuming unconstrained transition rates, this model provides a substantially better fit for the manus and a nearly identical fit for the pes. Ancestral states reconstructed assuming the constrained model imply patterns of limb evolution differing significantly from those implied by reconstructions for uniform-rate models, particularly for the pes; whereas ancestral states for the uniform-rate models consistently entail the reacquisition of pedal digits, those for the model incorporating among-lineage rate heterogeneity imply repeated, unreversed digit loss. These results indicate that the assumption of identical transition rates for all branches in a phylogeny may be inappropriate in modeling the evolution of phenotypic traits and emphasize the need for careful evaluation of phylogenetic tests of Dollo's law.
表型进化的速率源于在不同时空尺度上起作用的众多相互关联的过程,并且在不同的谱系中经常有很大的差异。虽然目前用于重建祖先特征状态的模型允许不同类型的转变(前进和后退转变以及不同状态之间的转变)具有独立的速率,但通常假定这些速率对于系统发育树中的所有分支都是相同的。在本文中,我提出了一种通用的特征进化模型,允许分支之间存在速率异质性。该模型用于评估假设统一转变速率对蜥蜴科 Lerista 祖先肢体形态重建的影响程度,以及速率变化可能导致进化模式推断产生误导的程度。允许分支之间的速率变化显著提高了手和脚的模型拟合度。在每种情况下,都强烈支持一个约束模型,其中假设指节获取的速率实际上为零;与假设无约束转变速率的模型相比,该模型对手和脚提供了更好的拟合度。在假设约束模型下重建的祖先状态暗示了肢体进化的模式与统一速率模型的重建暗示有很大的不同,特别是对于脚;而对于统一速率模型的祖先状态始终意味着重新获得足趾,对于包含谱系间速率异质性的模型,意味着重复的、不可逆转的趾骨丢失。这些结果表明,在为表型特征的进化建模时,假设系统发育树中所有分支的转变速率相同可能是不合适的,并强调需要仔细评估 Dollo 法则的系统发育检验。