Kohlsdorf Tiana, Wagner Günter P
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 165 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.
Evolution. 2006 Sep;60(9):1896-912.
Reevolution of lost characters constitutes evidence that the capacity for producing specific phenotypes may remain latent after a trait is lost and be transmitted over many generations without visible effect. Although some evolutionary changes are easily reversible, it can be argued that the reappearance of complex characters would be nearly impossible. This idea is based on the assumption that, after a structure is lost, the genes related to its development will degenerate. In the present paper we test this idea with respect to digit loss in the gymnophthalmid genus Bachia. We present a molecular phylogeny of the genus Bachia and investigate the evolution of digit number in this taxon. Most members of this South American genus have undergone major reduction in hind limbs without ever losing all the digits in the forelimbs. We apply three statistical methods to test the hypothesis that trait loss is irreversible (Dollo's law). These are tree tests, parsimony-cost curves, and likelihood-ratio tests. Data is also analyzed under a simple probability model. All analyses provided strong evidence for reevolution of digit number in derived Bachia species. The evidence is stronger in toes (hind limb) than in fingers (forelimb). Other published examples of reevolution of complex traits are discussed in the light of the statistical approaches used in this paper. We conclude that there are a limited number of cases with strong evidence for the reevolution of lost morphological structures, raising questions about the mechanisms that retain the genetic information for a latent character.
丢失性状的重新演化构成了这样一种证据,即产生特定表型的能力在一个性状丢失后可能会保持潜伏状态,并在许多代中传递而无可见效应。尽管一些进化变化很容易逆转,但可以认为复杂性状的重新出现几乎是不可能的。这个观点基于这样一种假设,即一个结构丢失后,与其发育相关的基因将会退化。在本文中,我们针对盲蜥属(Bachia)的指(趾)丢失情况来检验这一观点。我们给出了盲蜥属的分子系统发育树,并研究了该分类单元中趾(指)数目的演化。这个南美洲属的大多数成员后肢都经历了大幅退化,但前肢的所有指(趾)从未全部丢失。我们应用三种统计方法来检验性状丢失是不可逆的这一假设(多洛法则)。这些方法是系统发育树检验、简约成本曲线和似然比检验。数据也在一个简单概率模型下进行了分析。所有分析都为衍生的盲蜥物种中趾(指)数目的重新演化提供了有力证据。在趾(后肢)方面的证据比在指(前肢)方面更强。本文根据所使用的统计方法,对其他已发表的复杂性状重新演化的例子进行了讨论。我们得出结论,有确凿证据表明形态结构丢失后重新演化的情况数量有限,这引发了关于保留潜在性状遗传信息机制的问题。