Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2010 Dec;38(12):2304-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fa02cd.
To investigate the specificity of the electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the critical care unit setting.
Retrospective observational cohort analysis.
An 880-bed tertiary care teaching hospital with 120 intensive care unit beds.
The population included medical, surgical, trauma, and neurosurgical intensive care unit patients.
Electrocardiograms were systematically collected to include all consecutive recordings over a 15-month period in which the interpretation software indicated ACUTE MI. Patient demographics, markers of intensive care unit complexity, and hospital mortality were ascertained. The electrocardiograms were then further evaluated by a blinded, board-certified cardiologist for agreement or disagreement with the interpretation software. Serum troponin measurements obtained within 96 hrs of electrocardiogram acquisition were used to determine the likelihood of myocardial infarction.
Over the 15-month study period, the interpretation software diagnosed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 67 of 2243 intensive care unit patients (2.99%) who had an electrocardiogram performed. In the final study population of 46 cases with electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 85% had peak troponin elevation<5 ng/mL, a strong suggestion against clinical ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The cardiologist agreed with the computer interpretation in 39% (18 of 46) of cases, but of those 18 patients, only six showed a significant rise in the troponin level. The cardiologist disagreed with the computer interpretation in 60.9% (28 of 46) of cases and of those, one patient had a marked elevation of the cardiac troponin.
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the intensive care unit is a relatively common electrocardiographic reading both by standard interpretation software and by expert evaluation. In contrast to nonintensive care unit patients who present with chest pain, the electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnosis seems to be a nonspecific finding in the intensive care unit that is frequently the result of a variety of nonischemic processes. The vast majority of such patients do not have frank ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
研究重症监护病房心电图诊断 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的特异性。
回顾性观察队列分析。
拥有 880 张床位的三级教学医院,设有 120 张重症监护病床。
患者人群包括内科、外科、创伤和神经外科重症监护病房的患者。
系统收集心电图,包括在 15 个月期间连续记录的所有心电图,其中解释软件提示“急性心肌梗死”。确定患者的人口统计学特征、重症监护病房复杂性的标志物和医院死亡率。然后,由一名经过盲法认证的心脏病专家进一步评估心电图,以确定与解释软件的一致性或不一致性。在获得心电图后 96 小时内获得的血清肌钙蛋白测量值用于确定心肌梗死的可能性。
在 15 个月的研究期间,解释软件在接受心电图检查的 2243 名重症监护病房患者中诊断出 67 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(2.99%)。在最终的研究人群中,46 例心电图 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,85%的患者肌钙蛋白峰值升高<5ng/ml,强烈提示临床 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死不成立。心脏病专家与计算机解释在 39%(46 例中的 18 例)的病例中一致,但在这 18 例患者中,只有 6 例的肌钙蛋白水平显著升高。心脏病专家与计算机解释在 60.9%(46 例中的 28 例)的病例中不一致,其中 1 例患者的心脏肌钙蛋白明显升高。
重症监护病房的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死是一种相对常见的心电图表现,无论是标准解释软件还是专家评估都是如此。与非重症监护病房患者出现胸痛不同,心电图 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的诊断在重症监护病房似乎是一种非特异性表现,经常是多种非缺血性过程的结果。绝大多数此类患者没有明显的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。