Who or what is 'the public'?

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Wickson Fern, Delgado Ana, Kjølberg Kamilla Lein

机构信息

GenØk Centre for Biosafety, PB 6418, 9294, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Nat Nanotechnol. 2010 Nov;5(11):757-8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.197. Epub 2010 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1038/nnano.2010.197

PMID:20890275

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Who or what is 'the public'?

Nat Nanotechnol. 2010 Nov;5(11):757-8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.197. Epub 2010 Oct 3.

Nanomedicine: grounds for optimism, and a call for papers.

Lancet. 2003 Aug 30;362(9385):673.

Consumer relations. Are you being served?

Nurs Times. 1986;82(10):28-30.

Consumerism and public psychiatry.

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jan;44(1):5. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.1.5.

Consumer relations. On-screen learning.

Nurs Times. 1986;82(10):33.

Consumer durable. Interview by Heather Stephen.

Nurs Stand. 1999;13(36):18-9.

Advocacy for public health: a primer.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 May;58(5):361-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.018051.

Finding advocacy opportunities: how can scientists make a difference.

Physiologist. 2013 Mar;56(2):53-4.

From public interest to political justice.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2004 Winter;13(1):20-7. doi: 10.1017/s0963180104131058.

Changes in health care and public attitudes that are affecting the status of the medical profession.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Sep;70(8):1119-23.

引用本文的文献

A scoping review of ethical aspects of public-private partnerships in digital health.

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 27;8(1):129. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01515-3.

Sustainability assessment as problem structuring: three typical ways.

Sustain Sci. 2017;12(2):305-317. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0417-x. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

Collective agency and the concept of 'public' in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis.

BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jan 5;17:1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z.

The communication challenges presented by nanofoods.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2011 Oct 30;6(11):683-8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.193.

Science in the service of citizens and consumers.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.263.

本文引用的文献

The new deficit model.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Oct;4(10):609-11. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.278.

Upstream engagement and the governance of science. The shadow of the genetically modified crops experience in Europe.

EMBO Rep. 2009 Aug;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18-22. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.138.

Mind the gap revisited.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 May;4(5):273-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.26.

Hearts and minds and nanotechnology.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Mar;4(3):136-7. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.16. Epub 2009 Feb 8.

Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Feb;4(2):95-8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.362. Epub 2008 Dec 7.

Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Feb;4(2):87-90. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.341. Epub 2008 Dec 7.

Rules of engagement.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2007 Jul;2(7):386-7. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.204.

Nanotoxicology. Nanotechnology grows up.

Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1732-4. doi: 10.1126/science.304.5678.1732.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Who or what is 'the public'?

Nat Nanotechnol. 2010 Nov;5(11):757-8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.197. Epub 2010 Oct 3.

Nanomedicine: grounds for optimism, and a call for papers.

Lancet. 2003 Aug 30;362(9385):673.

Consumer relations. Are you being served?

Nurs Times. 1986;82(10):28-30.

Consumerism and public psychiatry.

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jan;44(1):5. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.1.5.

Consumer relations. On-screen learning.

Nurs Times. 1986;82(10):33.

Consumer durable. Interview by Heather Stephen.

Nurs Stand. 1999;13(36):18-9.

Advocacy for public health: a primer.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 May;58(5):361-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.018051.

Finding advocacy opportunities: how can scientists make a difference.

Physiologist. 2013 Mar;56(2):53-4.

From public interest to political justice.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2004 Winter;13(1):20-7. doi: 10.1017/s0963180104131058.

Changes in health care and public attitudes that are affecting the status of the medical profession.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Sep;70(8):1119-23.

引用本文的文献

A scoping review of ethical aspects of public-private partnerships in digital health.

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 27;8(1):129. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01515-3.

Sustainability assessment as problem structuring: three typical ways.

Sustain Sci. 2017;12(2):305-317. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0417-x. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

Collective agency and the concept of 'public' in public involvement: A practice-oriented analysis.

BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jan 5;17:1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0083-z.

The communication challenges presented by nanofoods.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2011 Oct 30;6(11):683-8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.193.

Science in the service of citizens and consumers.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.263.

本文引用的文献

The new deficit model.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Oct;4(10):609-11. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.278.

Upstream engagement and the governance of science. The shadow of the genetically modified crops experience in Europe.

EMBO Rep. 2009 Aug;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18-22. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.138.

Mind the gap revisited.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 May;4(5):273-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.26.

Hearts and minds and nanotechnology.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Mar;4(3):136-7. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.16. Epub 2009 Feb 8.

Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Feb;4(2):95-8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.362. Epub 2008 Dec 7.

Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Feb;4(2):87-90. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.341. Epub 2008 Dec 7.

Rules of engagement.

Nat Nanotechnol. 2007 Jul;2(7):386-7. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.204.

Nanotoxicology. Nanotechnology grows up.

Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1732-4. doi: 10.1126/science.304.5678.1732.