Science in the service of citizens and consumers.
作者信息
Toumey Chris
机构信息
Chris Toumey is at the University of South Carolina Nano Center, USA.
出版信息
Nat Nanotechnol. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.263.
PMID:21179093
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Science in the service of citizens and consumers.
Nat Nanotechnol. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.263.
2
Considering quality: engaging consumers to make better health care decisions.考量质量：促使消费者做出更优的医疗保健决策。
Issue Brief (Grantmakers Health). 2007 Jan(27):i-v, 1-31.
3
Citizens Ensuring Access to Health Care (CEATH). A case study in advocacy.公民确保医疗保健可及性组织（CEATH）。一项倡导案例研究。
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 2002 Fall;7(1):12-5.
4
The pharmaceutical industry's experiment with a consumer advisory panel: an inside view.制药行业对消费者咨询小组的试验：内部视角。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1984 Fall;9(4):7-10. doi: 10.1097/00004010-198400940-00002.
5
Facilitating consumer participation: an approach to finding the 'right' consumer.
Collegian. 2010;17(3):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2010.03.001.
6
[Citizens' health. Interview by Grethe Kjaergaard].[公民健康。格雷特·凯耶gaard的访谈]
Sygeplejersken. 1992 May 20;92(21):suppl 4-6.
7
Involving consumers on boards.
Issue Brief Cent Medicare Educ. 2002;3(8):1-4.
8
Management by objection? Public policies to protect choice in health plans.
Med Care Res Rev. 1999;56 Suppl 1:145-65; discussion 166-76. doi: 10.1177/1077558799056001S09.
9
How consumers can and should improve clinical trials.消费者如何能够且应该改进临床试验。
Lancet. 2001 Jun 2;357(9270):1721.
10
Consumer participation in the planning and delivery of drug treatment services: the current arrangements.消费者参与药物治疗服务的规划与提供：当前的安排
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008 Mar;27(2):130-7. doi: 10.1080/09595230701829397.
引用本文的文献
1
Developing 'Smart' Dairy Farming Responsive to Farmers and Consumer-Citizens: A Review.发展对农民和公民消费者有响应的“智能”奶牛养殖：综述
Animals (Basel). 2022 Feb 2;12(3):360. doi: 10.3390/ani12030360.
2
Chemistry on a global stage. The international year of chemistry gives chemists a chance to raise the profile of their subject.
Nat Nanotechnol. 2011 Jan;6(1):1. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.276.
本文引用的文献
1
Who or what is 'the public'?
Nat Nanotechnol. 2010 Nov;5(11):757-8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.197. Epub 2010 Oct 3.
2
Scientific literacy. NSF board draws flak for dropping evolution from Indicators.科学素养。美国国家科学基金会委员会因从指标中删除进化论而遭到抨击。
Science. 2010 Apr 9;328(5975):150-1. doi: 10.1126/science.328.5975.150.
Zotero 插件