Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Anat Sci Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;3(6):295-9. doi: 10.1002/ase.184. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
This study integrated an in-house audience response system (ARS) in the human anatomy course over two years to determine whether students performed better on high-stakes examinations following exposure to similar interactive questions in a large lecture format. Questions in an interactive ARS format were presented in lectures via PowerPoint presentations. Students who chose to participate in the anonymous ARS sessions submitted answers via their personal wireless devices (e.g., laptops, smartphones, PDAs, etc). Students were surveyed for feedback. Student participation in ARS activities was greatest (65-80%) in the first lecture. The number of students who actively participated in ARS activities decreased over the next four sessions, and then slightly increased in the last two sessions. This trend was the same for both years. Use of the ARS did not dramatically enhance overall student performance on examination questions that dealt with content similar to content presented in the ARS sessions. However, students who scored in the lower quartile of the examination performed better on the examination questions after the ARS was implemented. Accordingly, our findings suggest that the effect of ARS to improve student performance on examinations was not uniform. The overall benefit of an ARS to enhance the lecture experience was confirmed by student surveys.
本研究在两年内将内部使用的即时反馈系统(ARS)整合到人体解剖学课程中,以确定在以大型讲座形式呈现类似互动问题后,学生在高风险考试中的表现是否更好。互动式 ARS 格式的问题通过 PowerPoint 演示在讲座中提出。选择参与匿名 ARS 会议的学生通过个人无线设备(例如笔记本电脑、智能手机、PDA 等)提交答案。学生对反馈进行了调查。ARS 活动的学生参与度最高(65-80%)在第一讲。在接下来的四节课中,积极参与 ARS 活动的学生人数减少,然后在最后两节课中略有增加。这两年都是如此。ARS 的使用并没有显著提高学生在与 ARS 课程中呈现的内容相似的考试问题上的整体表现。然而,在实施 ARS 后,在考试中得分较低的学生在考试问题上的表现更好。因此,我们的发现表明,ARS 对提高学生考试成绩的效果并不统一。学生调查证实了 ARS 增强讲座体验的整体益处。