• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用个人反应系统的表观遗传学三明治模型实验:对学习增益、学生参与度和满意度的洞察。

A Sandwich-model experiment with personal response systems on epigenetics: insights into learning gain, student engagement and satisfaction.

机构信息

Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

出版信息

FEBS Open Bio. 2021 May;11(5):1282-1298. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13135. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1002/2211-5463.13135
PMID:33660429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8091589/
Abstract

Current trends in Higher Education Pedagogies include an ongoing discussion about active learning strategies. Technology-based interventions such as personal response systems (PRS) have gained momentum, especially since the advent of cloud-/web-based solutions. One model that supports the transition from traditional lecturing towards active learning by maintaining a balance between instruction and self-learning is the 'Sandwich Model'. In the present study, we investigated the impact of the Sandwich Model combined with PRS in student learning, engagement and satisfaction by a randomised trial in a large undergraduate biomedical/medical sciences class. A teaching session on epigenetics was delivered either as a traditional lecture (C-group) or as a PRS-including Sandwich-based session (S-group). The major finding of our experiment was the significantly enhanced performance of the S-group over the control, suggesting that the Sandwich Model improves learning gain. We also provide strong evidence that the Sandwich Model enhances student engagement and satisfaction. However, the effect of the Sandwich Model in learning gain and student attitudes was not dependent on PRS incorporation per se and students seemed to favour non-PRS activities over PRS, as evidenced by their feedback. Although further experimental research is needed in order to conclusively compare and contrast PRS and non-PRS activities regarding learning gain, we propose the usage of the Sandwich Model with a variety of in-class learning activities, both PRS and non-PRS-based. Altogether, our work shows that the Sandwich Model is a powerful pedagogical approach that exerts a positive impact on student perceptions for learning and satisfaction and that can support the teaching of challenging biomedical concepts, such as epigenetics.

摘要

当前高等教育教学法的趋势包括对主动学习策略的持续讨论。基于技术的干预措施,如个人响应系统 (PRS),已经得到了发展,尤其是自从基于云/网络的解决方案出现以来。一种支持从传统讲授向主动学习过渡的模式是“三明治模型”,它在教学和自学之间保持平衡。在本研究中,我们通过在一个大型本科生物医学/医学科学班中进行随机试验,研究了 PRS 与三明治模型结合对学生学习、参与度和满意度的影响。一堂关于表观遗传学的教学课要么以传统讲座的形式(C 组),要么以包括 PRS 的三明治模型形式(S 组)进行。我们实验的主要发现是 S 组的表现明显优于对照组,这表明三明治模型提高了学习效果。我们还提供了强有力的证据表明,三明治模型增强了学生的参与度和满意度。然而,三明治模型在学习效果和学生态度方面的影响并不取决于 PRS 的融入本身,而且学生似乎更喜欢非 PRS 活动而不是 PRS,这从他们的反馈中可以看出。尽管为了明确比较 PRS 和非 PRS 活动在学习效果方面的差异,还需要进一步的实验研究,但我们建议在课堂上使用各种学习活动,包括 PRS 和非 PRS 活动来使用三明治模型。总之,我们的工作表明,三明治模型是一种强大的教学方法,它对学生的学习和满意度有积极的影响,可以支持具有挑战性的生物医学概念的教学,如表观遗传学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/1d190371818e/FEB4-11-1282-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/5db26266bd12/FEB4-11-1282-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/b7a76f11002e/FEB4-11-1282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/9148897f8473/FEB4-11-1282-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/30f63294f9d8/FEB4-11-1282-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/f8685762c7f2/FEB4-11-1282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/ac8f038493a7/FEB4-11-1282-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/1d190371818e/FEB4-11-1282-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/5db26266bd12/FEB4-11-1282-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/b7a76f11002e/FEB4-11-1282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/9148897f8473/FEB4-11-1282-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/30f63294f9d8/FEB4-11-1282-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/f8685762c7f2/FEB4-11-1282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/ac8f038493a7/FEB4-11-1282-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/8091589/1d190371818e/FEB4-11-1282-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A Sandwich-model experiment with personal response systems on epigenetics: insights into learning gain, student engagement and satisfaction.采用个人反应系统的表观遗传学三明治模型实验:对学习增益、学生参与度和满意度的洞察。
FEBS Open Bio. 2021 May;11(5):1282-1298. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13135. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
Education in focus: Significant improvements in student learning and satisfaction with ophthalmology teaching delivered using a blended learning approach.教育焦点:采用混合式学习方法显著提高了学生的学习效果和对眼科学教学的满意度。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 1;19(7):e0305755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305755. eCollection 2024.
3
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Online instructional anatomy videos: Student usage, self-efficacy, and performance in upper limb regional anatomy assessment.在线教学解剖视频:学生在上肢局部解剖评估中的使用、自我效能感和表现。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;11(5):461-470. doi: 10.1002/ase.1756. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
5
Assessing the Impact of Voice-Over Screen-Captured Presentations Delivered Online on Dental Students' Learning.评估在线提供的画外音屏幕录制演示对牙科学生学习的影响。
J Dent Educ. 2016 Feb;80(2):141-8.
6
Restructuring the clinical curriculum at University Medical Center Göttingen: effects of distance teaching on students' satisfaction and learning outcome.格丁根大学医学中心临床课程重构:远程教学对学生满意度和学习效果的影响。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jan 28;38(1):Doc1. doi: 10.3205/zma001397. eCollection 2021.
7
The Effect of Content Delivery Style on Student Performance in Anatomy.内容传递方式对解剖学中学生表现的影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2019 Jan;12(1):43-51. doi: 10.1002/ase.1787. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Using technology to increase student (and faculty satisfaction with) engagement in medical education.利用技术提高学生(和教师)对医学教育的参与度。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2019 Sep 1;43(3):408-413. doi: 10.1152/advan.00033.2019.
9
Factors Influencing Medical Students' Experiences and Satisfaction with Blended Integrated E-Learning.影响医学生混合式整合电子学习体验和满意度的因素。
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(4):396-402. doi: 10.1159/000505210. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
10
Online learning in paediatrics: a student-led web-based learning modality.儿科学在线学习:一种以学生为主导的基于网络的学习模式。
Clin Teach. 2010 Mar;7(1):53-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2009.00337.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Sandwich teaching improved students' critical thinking, self-learning ability, and course experience in the Community Nursing Course: A quasi-experimental study.三明治教学法提高了社区护理课程中护生的评判性思维、自主学习能力及课程体验:一项半实验性研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 29;13:957652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957652. eCollection 2022.
2
Engagement with video content in the blended classroom.混合式课堂中的视频内容参与度。
Essays Biochem. 2022 Apr 29;66(1):5-10. doi: 10.1042/EBC20210055.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of an audience response system on a summative assessment, a controlled field study.观众反应系统对总结性评估的影响,一项对照现场研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02130-4.
2
Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom.测量实际学习与感觉学习,以回应在课堂上的积极参与。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 24;116(39):19251-19257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821936116. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
3
Effect of chronotype on academic achievement in a sample of Italian University students.
意大利大学生样本中昼夜型对学业成绩的影响。
Chronobiol Int. 2019 Nov;36(11):1482-1495. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1652831. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
4
Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease.表观遗传学的进展将遗传学与环境和疾病联系起来。
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7766):489-499. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1411-0. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
5
Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning.减轻学生对主动学习抵触情绪的策略。
Int J STEM Educ. 2018;5(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Examining the impact of audience response systems on student performance in anatomy education: a randomised controlled trial.考察观众反应系统对解剖学教育中学生表现的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Scott Med J. 2018 Feb;63(1):16-21. doi: 10.1177/0036933017741409. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
7
Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities.北美大学 STEM 教学的剖析。
Science. 2018 Mar 30;359(6383):1468-1470. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8892. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
8
Evaluation of students' perceptions of the Socrative application versus a traditional student response system and its impact on classroom engagement.评估学生对Socrative应用程序与传统学生应答系统的看法及其对课堂参与度的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):808-812. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
9
An Analysis of the Perceptions and Resources of Large University Classes.对大型大学课堂的认知与资源的分析。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Summer;16(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0004.
10
Do Students Really Have an Inability to Concentrate During Lectures?学生在讲座期间真的无法集中注意力吗?
Acad Med. 2017 Apr;92(4):428. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001584.