Williams N
University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Immunol Ser. 1990;49:215-29.
A substantial body of data now indicate that megakaryocytopoiesis is regulated, like erythropoiesis, on at least two levels--a constitutive maintenance of progenitor cells and a megakaryocyte pool that respond to thrombopoietic stimuli in response to altered platelet demand. The above model is assembled on the following observations: (a) Megakaryocyte progenitors are not regulated by platelet mass and therefore are not controlled via thrombopoietin, (b) IL-3 is the most potent stimulator of megakaryocyte progenitor cells described thus far, and therefore is a likely candidate for in-vivo maintenance of progenitor cell numbers, (c) thrombopoietin is the major stimulus for megakaryocyte development into platelets with their subsequent release into the circulation. Can such a model meet physiological requirements? It is not clear that IL-3 can be produced in the bone marrow. At best it can be speculated that megakaryocyte progenitors are sustained by an "IL-3-like" or GM-CSF mechanism but the triggering mechanism may be membrane bound or via a separate molecule that activates a similar mechanism. It is quite possible that IL-3 has little to do with normal megakaryocytopoiesis, and that IL-3 levels are elevated only in immune responses that stimulate T cells to release IL-3. It is now known that IL-3 will stimulate all levels of megakaryocyte development, and this system may be a thrombopoietin-independent nonspecific mechanism of platelet formation. Such a concept demands that IL-3 can stimulate platelet release in the in-vivo thrombopoietin assay, as should appropriate stimulation in vivo by a strong and specific T-cell mitogen. A second hypothesis is that IL-3 may be involved in a synergistic pathway with either TSF or thrombopoietin, based on the synergy between these two types of activities in cell culture. This concept requires that IL-3 be produced in very low but active amounts in the bone marrow or by an IL-3-like mechanism. Amplification of the IL-3-type-induced signal would then depend on the second factor. This mode requires only low levels of IL-3 (may be sub-threshold by Northern blot analysis or biological assays). Synergy with thrombopoietin with IL-3 or an IL-3-like mechanism would mean that only low levels of thrombopoietin would also be required to sustain normal megakaryocytopoiesis. This concept fits earlier data where thrombopoiesis persists at reduced rates in transfusion-induced thrombocytotic mice. Thus, in thrombocytopenic conditions, when thrombopoietin levels become elevated, an increased rate of megakaryocytopoiesis would be observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
大量数据表明,巨核细胞生成至少在两个水平上受到调控,类似于红细胞生成——祖细胞和巨核细胞池的组成性维持,它们会响应血小板需求的变化对血小板生成刺激做出反应。上述模型是基于以下观察结果构建的:(a)巨核细胞祖细胞不受血小板数量调控,因此不受血小板生成素控制;(b)白细胞介素-3是迄今为止所描述的巨核细胞祖细胞最有效的刺激物,因此可能是体内维持祖细胞数量的候选因素;(c)血小板生成素是巨核细胞发育成血小板并随后释放到循环中的主要刺激因素。这样的模型能否满足生理需求?目前尚不清楚白细胞介素-3能否在骨髓中产生。充其量只能推测巨核细胞祖细胞由“白细胞介素-3样”或粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子机制维持,但触发机制可能是膜结合的,或者是通过激活类似机制的另一种分子。很有可能白细胞介素-3与正常巨核细胞生成关系不大,且白细胞介素-3水平仅在刺激T细胞释放白细胞介素-3的免疫反应中升高。现在已知白细胞介素-3会刺激巨核细胞发育的各个阶段,并且这个系统可能是一种不依赖血小板生成素的血小板形成非特异性机制。这样的概念要求白细胞介素-3能在体内血小板生成素检测中刺激血小板释放,就像在体内被强效特异性T细胞有丝分裂原适当刺激时一样。第二个假设是,基于这两种活性在细胞培养中的协同作用,白细胞介素-3可能参与了与血小板生成刺激因子或血小板生成素的协同途径。这个概念要求白细胞介素-3在骨髓中以非常低但有活性的量产生,或者通过类似白细胞介素-3的机制产生。白细胞介素-3型诱导信号的放大随后将取决于第二个因素。这种模式只需要低水平的白细胞介素-3(通过Northern印迹分析或生物学检测可能低于阈值)。白细胞介素-3与血小板生成素或类似白细胞介素-3的机制协同作用意味着维持正常巨核细胞生成也只需要低水平的血小板生成素。这个概念与早期数据相符,即在输血诱导的血小板增多小鼠中血小板生成以较低速率持续存在。因此,在血小板减少的情况下,当血小板生成素水平升高时,会观察到巨核细胞生成速率增加。(摘要截选至400字)