Department of Medicine, Center for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16):1570-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.850297. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
Cardiac mortality rates vary substantially between countries and ethnic groups. It is unclear, however, whether South Asian, Chinese, and white populations have a variable prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). To clarify this association, we compared mortality, use of revascularization procedures, and risk of recurrent AMI and hospitalization for heart failure between these ethnic groups in a universal-access healthcare system.
We used a population cohort study design using hospital administrative data linked to cardiac procedure registries from British Columbia and the Calgary Health Region Area in Alberta (1994 to 2003) to identify AMI cases. Patient ethnicity was categorized using validated surname algorithms. There were 2190 South Asian, 946 Chinese, and 38479 white patients with AMI identified. There was no significant difference in use of revascularization procedures between ethnic groups at 30 d and 1 year. Short-term (30-day) mortality was higher among Chinese relative to white patients (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.48). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between South Asian and white patients. South Asian patients had a 35% lower relative risk of long-term mortality compared with white patients (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.72). There was no significant difference in long-term mortality between Chinese and white patients. Among AMI survivors, Chinese patients had a lower risk of recurrent AMI, whereas there was no difference between South Asian and white patients.
The ethnic groups studied have striking differences in outcomes after AMI, with South Asian patients having significantly lower long-term mortality after AMI.
在不同国家和族裔群体之间,心脏死亡率存在显著差异。然而,尚不清楚南亚、中国和白人人群在急性心肌梗死(AMI)后是否存在预后差异。为了阐明这种关联,我们在一个全民医疗保健系统中比较了这些族裔群体之间的死亡率、血运重建程序的使用情况以及再次发生 AMI 和因心力衰竭住院的风险。
我们使用了基于人群的队列研究设计,利用不列颠哥伦比亚省和艾伯塔省卡尔加里地区的医院行政数据以及心脏手术登记数据(1994 年至 2003 年)来确定 AMI 病例。患者的种族通过经过验证的姓氏算法进行分类。共确定了 2190 例南亚裔、946 例华裔和 38479 例白人 AMI 患者。在 30 天和 1 年时,不同族裔群体之间血运重建程序的使用没有显著差异。与白人患者相比,中国患者的短期(30 天)死亡率更高(比值比,1.23;95%置信区间,1.02 至 1.48)。南亚裔和白人患者之间 30 天死亡率没有显著差异。与白人患者相比,南亚裔患者的长期死亡率相对风险降低了 35%(风险比,0.65;95%置信区间,0.57 至 0.72)。中国患者和白人患者之间长期死亡率没有显著差异。在 AMI 幸存者中,中国患者再次发生 AMI 的风险较低,而南亚裔和白人患者之间没有差异。
研究中的族裔群体在 AMI 后的结局存在显著差异,与白人患者相比,南亚裔患者 AMI 后长期死亡率显著降低。