Suppr超能文献

连接实例以促进儿童的关系推理。

Connecting instances to promote children's relational reasoning.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, California State University, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Feb;108(2):260-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.011.

Abstract

The practice of learning from multiple instances seems to allow children to learn about relational structure. The experiments reported here focused on two issues regarding relational learning from multiple instances: (a) what kind of perceptual situations foster such learning and (b) how particular object properties, such as complexity and similarity, interact with relational learning. Two kinds of perceptual situations were of interest here: simultaneous view, where instances are viewed at once, and sequential view, where instances are viewed one at a time (one right after the other). We examined the influence of particular perceptual situations and object properties using two tests of relational reasoning: a common match-to-sample task, where new instances are compared with a common sample, and a variable match-to-sample task, where new instances are compared with a sample that varies on each trial. Experiments 1 and 2 indicate that simultaneous presentation of even highly dissimilar instances, one simple and one complex, effectively connects them together and improves relational generalization in both match-to-sample tasks. Experiment 3 shows that simple samples are more effective than complex ones in the common match-to-sample task. However, when one instance is not used a common sample and various pairs of instances are simply compared, as in Experiment 4, simple and rich instances are equally effective at promoting relational learning. These results bear on our understanding of how children connect instances and how those initial connections affect learning and generalization.

摘要

从多个实例中学习的做法似乎允许儿童了解关系结构。这里报告的实验主要集中在从多个实例中进行关系学习的两个问题上:(a)什么样的感知情况促进了这种学习;(b)特定的物体属性,如复杂性和相似性,如何与关系学习相互作用。这里有两种感兴趣的感知情况:同时视图,其中同时查看实例,以及顺序视图,其中一次查看一个实例(一个接一个)。我们使用两种关系推理测试来检查特定感知情况和物体属性的影响:常见的匹配样本任务,其中新实例与常见样本进行比较,以及变量匹配样本任务,其中新实例与每个试验中变化的样本进行比较。实验 1 和 2 表明,即使高度不同的实例(一个简单和一个复杂)同时呈现,也可以有效地将它们连接在一起,并在两种匹配样本任务中提高关系概括。实验 3 表明,在常见匹配样本任务中,简单样本比复杂样本更有效。然而,当一个实例不作为常见样本使用,并且简单地比较各种实例对时,如实验 4 所示,简单和丰富的实例在促进关系学习方面同样有效。这些结果对我们理解儿童如何连接实例以及这些初始连接如何影响学习和概括具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Connecting instances to promote children's relational reasoning.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Feb;108(2):260-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.011.
2
Cross-cultural differences in cognitive development: attention to relations and objects.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Sep;113(1):20-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
3
Sources of variation in preschoolers' relational reasoning: The interaction between language use and working memory.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2025 Apr;252:106149. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106149. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Equal spacing and expanding schedules in children's categorization and generalization.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jul;123:129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
5
Simplicity and generalization: Short-cutting abstraction in children's object categorizations.
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):626-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
6
Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):89-100. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.89.
7
Comparison patterns: An experimental study of transposition in children.
Behav Processes. 2020 Feb;171:104024. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.104024. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
The simple advantage in perceptual and categorical generalization.
Mem Cognit. 2016 Feb;44(2):292-306. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0553-z.
9
Relational reasoning and generalization using nonsymbolic neural networks.
Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;130(2):308-333. doi: 10.1037/rev0000371. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
10
At the same time or apart in time? The role of presentation timing and retrieval dynamics in generalization.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jan;38(1):246-54. doi: 10.1037/a0025260. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Word learning as category formation.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0327615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327615. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of impact on the meaning of generic sentences.
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 23;15:1363390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363390. eCollection 2024.
3
Trajectories of scientific reasoning: A microgenetic study on children's inquiry functioning.
J Pers Oriented Res. 2017 Nov 1;3(1):67-85. doi: 10.17505/jpor.2017.07. eCollection 2017.
4
Selective attention, filtering, and the development of working memory.
Dev Sci. 2019 Jan;22(1):e12727. doi: 10.1111/desc.12727. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
Novel names extend for how long preschool children sample visual information.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Apr;168:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
6
Costs of Selective Attention: When Children Notice What Adults Miss.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jun;28(6):723-732. doi: 10.1177/0956797617693005. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Comparison versus reminding.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2016;1(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0028-1. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
8
Selective attention, diffused attention, and the development of categorization.
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Dec;91:24-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
9
Planning following stroke: a relational complexity approach using the tower of london.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 23;8:1032. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01032. eCollection 2014.
10
Parts and Relations in Young Children's Shape-Based Object Recognition.
J Cogn Dev. 2011 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1080/15248372.2011.560586.

本文引用的文献

1
Linguistic Labels and Categorization in Infancy: Do Labels Facilitate or Hinder?
Infancy. 2007 May;11(3):233-253. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00225.x. Epub 2007 May 1.
2
The Importance of Being Interpreted: Grounded Words and Children's Relational Reasoning.
Front Psychol. 2012 Mar 7;3:45. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00045. eCollection 2012.
3
Two are better than one: comparison influences infants' visual recognition memory.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Sep;104(1):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
4
Simplicity and generalization: Short-cutting abstraction in children's object categorizations.
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):626-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
5
Learning theory. The advantage of abstract examples in learning math.
Science. 2008 Apr 25;320(5875):454-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1154659.
6
Mathematics. Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom.
Science. 2007 May 25;316(5828):1128-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1142103.
8
When actions speak louder than words: improving children's flexibility in a card-sorting task.
Psychol Sci. 2006 Aug;17(8):665-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01763.x.
9
Preschoolers' use of surface similarity in object comparisons: taking context into account.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Nov;95(3):194-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
10
The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Jun;12(3):508-13. doi: 10.3758/bf03193796.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验