• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤和软组织感染严重程度评估:住院患者管理和结局的队列研究。

Severity assessment of skin and soft tissue infections: cohort study of management and outcomes for hospitalized patients.

机构信息

Quality, Safety and Informatics Research Group, Division of Clinical and Population Sciences and Education, Mackenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee DD2 4BF, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Feb;66(2):387-97. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq362. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkq362
PMID:20926396
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are caused by bacterial invasion of the skin and underlying soft tissues and can present with a wide spectrum of signs, symptoms and illness severity. They are a common indication for antimicrobial therapy. However, there are few data on treatment outcomes or the validity of clinical severity scores.

METHODS

Two hundred and five adult patients admitted to Ninewells Hospital, Scotland in 2005, and treated with antibiotics for SSTI, were identified. They were stratified into four classes of severity (class IV = most severe) based on sepsis, co-morbidity and their standardized early warning score (SEWS). Empirical antimicrobial therapy by severity class was compared with the recommendations of a UK guideline.

RESULTS

Thirty-five different empirical antimicrobial regimens were prescribed. Overall, 43% of patients were over-treated, this being particularly common in the lowest severity class I (65% patients). Thirty-day mortality was 9% (18/205) and 17 patients (8%) died during their index admission. Mortality (30 day) and inadequate therapy increased with severity class: I, no sepsis or co-morbidity (45% patients, 1% mortality, 14% therapy inadequate); II, significant co-morbidity but no sepsis (32% patients, 11% mortality, 39% therapy inadequate); III, sepsis but SEWS <4 (17% of patients, 17% mortality, 39% therapy inadequate); and IV, sepsis plus SEWS ≥ 4 (6% of patients, 33% mortality, 92% therapy inadequate).

CONCLUSIONS

SSTI in hospital is associated with significant mortality. Choice of empirical therapy is not evidence based, with significant under-treatment of severely ill patients.

摘要

背景

皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)是由细菌入侵皮肤和皮下软组织引起的,可表现出广泛的体征、症状和疾病严重程度。它们是抗菌治疗的常见指征。然而,关于治疗结果或临床严重程度评分的有效性的数据很少。

方法

2005 年,苏格兰 Ninewells 医院收治了 205 例成人 SSTI 患者,这些患者接受了抗生素治疗。根据脓毒症、合并症和标准化早期预警评分(SEWS),将他们分为四级严重程度(IV 级=最严重)。根据严重程度分级,对经验性抗菌治疗与英国指南的建议进行了比较。

结果

共开出了 35 种不同的经验性抗菌方案。总体而言,43%的患者治疗过度,这在最低严重程度的 I 级(65%的患者)中尤其常见。30 天死亡率为 9%(18/205),17 名患者(8%)在入院期间死亡。死亡率(30 天)和治疗不足随着严重程度的增加而增加:I 级,无脓毒症或合并症(45%的患者,1%的死亡率,14%的治疗不足);II 级,有严重合并症但无脓毒症(32%的患者,11%的死亡率,39%的治疗不足);III 级,脓毒症但 SEWS<4(17%的患者,17%的死亡率,39%的治疗不足);IV 级,脓毒症加 SEWS≥4(6%的患者,33%的死亡率,92%的治疗不足)。

结论

医院内的 SSTI 与显著的死亡率相关。经验性治疗的选择不是基于证据的,严重疾病患者的治疗不足。

相似文献

1
Severity assessment of skin and soft tissue infections: cohort study of management and outcomes for hospitalized patients.皮肤和软组织感染严重程度评估:住院患者管理和结局的队列研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Feb;66(2):387-97. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq362. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
2
Empiric antimicrobial therapy for pediatric skin and soft-tissue infections in the era of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌时代小儿皮肤和软组织感染的经验性抗菌治疗
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):e959-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2428. Epub 2009 May 26.
3
Community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft-tissue infections: impact of antimicrobial therapy on outcome.社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤和软组织感染:抗菌治疗对结局的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 15;44(6):777-84. doi: 10.1086/511872. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
4
Skin and soft tissue infections caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的皮肤和软组织感染。
BETA. 2007 Summer;19(4):20-6.
5
Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗复杂性皮肤及软组织感染的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jun;49(6):2260-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2260-2266.2005.
6
Prospective study of severity assessment and management of acute medical admissions with skin and soft tissue infection.急性内科皮肤及软组织感染患者严重程度评估和管理的前瞻性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Apr;67(4):1016-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr554. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
7
Treatment and outcomes of infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at an ambulatory clinic.一家门诊诊所耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的治疗与结局
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Feb;51(2):423-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01244-06. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
8
Clinical practice. Skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.临床实践。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的皮肤和软组织感染
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):380-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp070747.
9
Emerging drugs for complicated skin and skin-structure infections.新型药物治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染。
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2010 Sep;15(3):509-20. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2010.497486.
10
Changes in the classification and management of skin and soft tissue infections.皮肤和软组织感染的分类和管理的变化。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Feb;66(2):232-4. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq443. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbiological and Clinical Features of Patients with Cellulitis in Tropical Australia: Disease Severity Assessment and Implications for Clinical Management.澳大利亚热带地区蜂窝织炎患者的微生物学和临床特征:疾病严重程度评估及对临床管理的意义
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Nov 19;112(2):337-345. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0450. Print 2025 Feb 5.
2
Development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict patients with cellulitis developing sepsis during hospitalisation.基于机器学习的模型的开发和外部验证,用于预测住院期间患有蜂窝织炎的患者发生脓毒症。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 5;14(7):e084183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084183.
3
Diagnostic methods for the confirmation of non-purulent cellulitis: a review.
非脓性蜂窝织炎确诊的诊断方法:综述
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Nov;315(9):2519-2527. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02658-7. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
4
Evaluation of Dundee and ALT-70 predictive models for cellulitis in 56 patients who underwent tissue culture.对56例接受组织培养的蜂窝织炎患者进行邓迪模型和ALT-70预测模型评估。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Apr;315(3):665-668. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02409-0. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
5
Standardization of Epidemiological Surveillance of Group A Streptococcal Cellulitis.A组链球菌性蜂窝织炎的流行病学监测标准化
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 15;9(Suppl 1):S25-S30. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac267. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Treatment of Wound Infections in a Mouse Model Using Zn-Releasing Phage Bound to Gold Nanorods.利用结合金纳米棒的释放 Zn 的噬菌体治疗小鼠模型中的伤口感染。
ACS Nano. 2022 Mar 22;16(3):4756-4774. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c00048. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
7
Necrotizing Bacterial Myositis as the Initial Presentation of Severe Aplastic Anaemia.坏死性细菌性肌炎作为重型再生障碍性贫血的首发表现
Case Rep Hematol. 2021 Dec 21;2021:8276937. doi: 10.1155/2021/8276937. eCollection 2021.
8
Accuracy of CREST Guideline in Management of Cellulitis in Emergency Department; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.《CREST指南在急诊科蜂窝织炎管理中的准确性:一项系统评价与Meta分析》
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 3;9(1):e69. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1422. eCollection 2021.
9
Current and future options for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections: focus on fluoroquinolones and long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics.治疗复杂皮肤和软组织感染的当前和未来选择:重点关注氟喹诺酮类药物和长效糖肽类抗生素。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Nov 22;76(Suppl 4):iv9-iv22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab351.
10
Effectiveness of Implementing a Locally Developed Antibiotic Use Guideline for Community-Acquired Cellulitis at a Large Tertiary Care University Hospital in Thailand.在泰国一所大型三级护理大学医院实施本地制定的社区获得性蜂窝织炎抗生素使用指南的效果。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 7;7(10):ofaa411. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa411. eCollection 2020 Oct.