Fronstin Paul
Employee Benefit Research Institute, USA.
EBRI Issue Brief. 2010 Aug(345):1-27.
ABOUT CDHPs: Employers began offering consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs) in 2001 when a handful started offering health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs). They then started offering health savings account (HSA)-eligible plans after the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 included a provision to allow individuals with certain high-deductible health plans to contribute to an HSA. This report summarizes what is known about CDHPs, which include both HRAs and HSAs. OFFER RATES: Surveys show that employers offering a CDHP increased from less than 5 percent in 2005 to between 12-15 percent by 2009. Growth in offer rates can be seen across all firm sizes. Recently, the percentage of small firms that offered a CDHP declined while larger firms continued to add a CDHP as an option.
Overall, 19.1 million, or 11 percent of individuals with private insurance, were enrolled in a CDHP in 2009. More recent data suggest that by 2010, 10 million people were in an HSA-eligible plan. PREMIUMS: Generally, premiums for CDHPs were lower than premiums for non-CDHPs. A number of studies have tried to explain the differences in premiums. One found savings ranged from 15.5 percent to a low of -4.7 percent, with average savings of 4.8 percent. However, the study found that most of the savings was due to younger, healthier workers choosing CDHPs and concluded that once typical risk- and benefit-adjustment factors were taken into account, CDHPs saved only 1.5 percent. There is strong evidence that initially CDHP enrollees will be healthier than non-CDHP enrollees, but that over time the CDHP population has a significantly higher illness burden. IMPACT OF CDHPS ON PREVENTIVE SERVICES: The studies agree that use of preventive services did not change (upward or downward) as a result of the CDHP. IMPACT OF CDHPS ON MEDICATION ADHERENCE: The studies found that overall use of brand-name prescription drugs fell and, while there was some offset from increased use of generic drugs, some enrollees stopped their use of prescription drugs. CDHP enrollees increased their use of the mail-order pharmacy option. Overall use of prescription drugs among CDHP enrollees with certain chronic conditions fell, or did not increase when enrollees met their deductible. One study found that the financial incentives of the plan are not sufficient in driving behavior, and that educational outreach also matters. NEED FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Despite the growing body of evidence on the effect of CDHPs on cost and quality, there are many unanswered questions about these plans. Most of the research to date has focused on HRA-based plans. Little systematic research has been conducted on HSA-eligible enrollees. The differences between these plans are significant enough to warrant separate analyses. Also, most of the research to date has ignored the impact of the account on the use of services and on spending. Individuals may use health care services differently depending on how much money is being contributed to the account, especially relative to the deductible, amounts rolled over, and portability of the account.
关于消费者驱动型健康计划(CDHP):雇主于2001年开始提供消费者驱动型健康计划,当时少数雇主开始提供健康报销安排(HRA)。2003年的《医疗保险处方药、改善和现代化法案》规定,符合某些高免赔额健康计划的个人可以向健康储蓄账户(HSA)缴款,此后雇主开始提供符合HSA资格的计划。本报告总结了关于CDHP的已知情况,CDHP包括HRA和HSA。
调查显示,提供CDHP的雇主比例从2005年的不到5%增至2009年的12% - 15%。各种规模的公司都出现了提供率增长。最近,提供CDHP的小公司比例有所下降,而大公司继续将CDHP作为一种选择。
总体而言,2009年有1910万人(占参加私人保险人数的11%)参加了CDHP。最新数据显示,到2010年,有1000万人参加了符合HSA资格的计划。
一般来说,CDHP的保费低于非CDHP的保费。多项研究试图解释保费差异。一项研究发现节省幅度在15.5%至低至 - 4.7%之间,平均节省4.8%。然而,该研究发现,大部分节省是由于更年轻、更健康的员工选择了CDHP,并得出结论,一旦考虑到典型的风险和福利调整因素,CDHP仅节省1.5%。有强有力的证据表明,最初参加CDHP的人会比未参加CDHP的人更健康,但随着时间推移,参加CDHP的人群疾病负担明显更高。
CDHP对预防服务的影响:研究一致认为,CDHP并未导致预防服务的使用(上升或下降)发生变化。
CDHP对药物依从性的影响:研究发现,名牌处方药的总体使用量下降,虽然非专利药使用量增加有一定抵消作用,但一些参保人停止了处方药的使用。参加CDHP 的人增加了对邮购药房选项的使用。患有某些慢性病的CDHP参保人处方药的总体使用量下降,或者在参保人达到免赔额时没有增加。一项研究发现该计划的经济激励措施不足以推动行为改变,教育推广也很重要。
尽管关于CDHP对成本和质量影响的证据越来越多,但关于这些计划仍有许多未解答的问题。迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在基于HRA的计划上。对符合HSA资格的参保人进行的系统研究很少。这些计划之间的差异足够大,值得分别进行分析。此外,迄今为止,大多数研究都忽略了账户对服务使用和支出的影响。个人可能会根据向账户缴款的金额,特别是相对于免赔额、结转金额和账户可携带性,以不同方式使用医疗服务。