Suppr超能文献

脑动静脉畸形的 3 级分类。临床文章。

A 3-tier classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Clinical article.

机构信息

Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):842-9. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS10663. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

Abstract

OBJECT

The authors propose a 3-tier classification for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The classification is based on the original 5-tier Spetzler-Martin grading system, and reflects the treatment paradigm for these lesions. The implications of this modification in the literature are explored.

METHODS

Class A combines Grades I and II AVMs, Class B are Grade III AVMs, and Class C combines Grades IV and V AVMs. Recommended management is surgery for Class A AVMs, multimodality treatment for Class B, and observation for Class C, with exceptions to the latter including recurrent hemorrhages and progressive neurological deficits. To evaluate whether combining grades is warranted from the perspective of surgical outcomes, the 3-tier system was applied to 1476 patients from 7 surgical series in which results were stratified according to Spetzler-Martin grades.

RESULTS

Pairwise comparisons of individual Spetzler-Martin grades in the series analyzed showed the fewest significant differences (p < 0.05) in outcomes between Grades I and II AVMs and between Grades IV and V AVMs. In the pooled data analysis, significant differences in outcomes were found between all grades except IV and V (p = 0.38), and the lowest relative risks were found between Grades I and II (1.066) and between Grades IV and V (1.095). Using the pooled data, the predictive accuracies for surgical outcomes of the 5-tier and 3-tier systems were equivalent (receiver operating characteristic curve area 0.711 and 0.713, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining Grades I and II AVMs and combining Grades IV and V AVMs is justified in part because the differences in surgical results between these respective pairs are small. The proposed 3-tier classification of AVMs offers simplification of the Spetzler-Martin system, provides a guide to treatment, and is predictive of outcome. The revised classification not only simplifies treatment recommendations; by placing patients into 3 as opposed to 5 groups, statistical power is markedly increased for series comparisons.

摘要

目的

作者提出了一种脑动静脉畸形(AVM)的 3 级分类法。该分类法基于原始的 Spetzler-Martin 5 级分级系统,并反映了这些病变的治疗模式。探讨了这种修改在文献中的意义。

方法

A级包括 I 级和 II 级 AVM,B 级为 III 级 AVM,C 级包括 IV 级和 V 级 AVM。推荐的治疗方法是对 A 级 AVM 进行手术,对 B 级进行多模态治疗,对 C 级进行观察,后者的例外情况包括反复出血和进行性神经功能缺损。为了从手术结果的角度评估合并等级是否合理,将 3 级系统应用于来自 7 个外科系列的 1476 名患者,这些结果根据 Spetzler-Martin 分级进行分层。

结果

对所分析系列中单个 Spetzler-Martin 分级的成对比较显示,AVM 级 I 和 II 级之间以及级 IV 和 V 级之间的结果差异最小(p < 0.05)。在汇总数据分析中,除了 IV 级和 V 级(p = 0.38)之外,所有分级之间的结果均存在显著差异,发现级 I 和 II 级之间(1.066)和级 IV 和 V 级之间(1.095)的相对风险最低。使用汇总数据,5 级和 3 级系统的手术结果预测准确性相当(接收者操作特征曲线面积分别为 0.711 和 0.713)。

结论

将 AVM 级 I 和 II 级合并,将级 IV 和 V 级合并在一定程度上是合理的,因为这些各自对之间的手术结果差异较小。提出的 AVM 3 级分类法简化了 Spetzler-Martin 系统,为治疗提供了指导,并可预测结果。修订后的分类法不仅简化了治疗建议;通过将患者分为 3 组而不是 5 组,大大增加了系列比较的统计能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验