Suppr超能文献

降低医疗差错:多学科团队培训在产科急症中的成本效益(TOSTI 研究);一项随机对照试验。

Reducing errors in health care: cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary team training in obstetric emergencies (TOSTI study); a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre Eindhoven-Veldhoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Oct 8;10:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-59.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are many avoidable deaths in hospitals because the care team is not well attuned. Training in emergency situations is generally followed on an individual basis. In practice, however, hospital patients are treated by a team composed of various disciplines. To prevent communication errors, it is important to focus the training on the team as a whole, rather than on the individual. Team training appears to be important in contributing toward preventing these errors. Obstetrics lends itself to multidisciplinary team training. It is a field in which nurses, midwives, obstetricians and paediatricians work together and where decisions must be made and actions must be carried out under extreme time pressure.It is attractive to belief that multidisciplinary team training will reduce the number of errors in obstetrics. The other side of the medal is that many hospitals are buying expensive patient simulators without proper evaluation of the training method. In the Netherlands many hospitals have 1,000 or less annual deliveries. In our small country it might therefore be more cost-effective to train obstetric teams in medical simulation centres with well trained personnel, high fidelity patient simulators, and well defined training programmes.

METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary team training in a medical simulation centre in the Netherlands to reduce the number of medical errors in obstetric emergency situations. We plan a multicentre randomised study with the centre as unit of analysis. Obstetric departments will be randomly assigned to receive multidisciplinary team training in a medical simulation centre or to a control arm without any team training.The composite measure of poor perinatal and maternal outcome in the non training group was thought to be 15%, on the basis of data obtained from the National Dutch Perinatal Registry and the guidelines of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG). We anticipated that multidisciplinary team training would reduce this risk to 5%. A sample size of 24 centres with a cluster size of each at least 200 deliveries, each 12 centres per group, was needed for 80% power and a 5% type 1 error probability (two-sided). We assumed an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) value of maximum 0.08.The analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle and stratified for teaching or non-teaching hospitals.Primary outcome is the number of obstetric complications throughout the first year period after the intervention. If multidisciplinary team training appears to be effective a cost-effective analysis will be performed.

DISCUSSION

If multidisciplinary team training appears to be cost-effective, this training should be implemented in extra training for gynaecologists.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol is registered in the clinical trial register number NTR1859.

摘要

背景

由于医护团队配合不佳,医院有许多本可避免的死亡案例。通常情况下,急救培训都是个人参与。但实际上,医院的病人是由不同科室的医护人员组成的团队进行治疗的。为了防止沟通失误,有必要将培训重点放在整个团队上,而不是个人身上。团队培训似乎对预防这些错误很重要。妇产科适合多学科团队培训。这是一个护士、助产士、产科医生和儿科医生一起工作的领域,在这个领域中,必须在极端的时间压力下做出决策并采取行动。人们相信,多学科团队培训将减少妇产科的错误数量,这是有道理的。但另一方面,许多医院在没有对培训方法进行适当评估的情况下,购买了昂贵的患者模拟器。在荷兰,许多医院每年的分娩量在 1000 次或更少。在我们这个小国家,在训练有素的人员、高保真度患者模拟器和明确的培训计划的医学模拟中心培训妇产科团队可能会更具成本效益。

方法/设计:本研究的目的是评估荷兰医学模拟中心多学科团队培训在减少妇产科急救情况下医疗错误数量方面的成本效益。我们计划进行一项多中心随机研究,以中心为单位进行分析。产科部门将被随机分配到医学模拟中心接受多学科团队培训或不接受任何团队培训的对照组。基于从荷兰全国围产期登记处和荷兰妇产科协会(NVOG)指南获得的数据,我们认为未经培训组的围产期和产妇不良结局的综合指标为 15%。我们预计多学科团队培训将将这一风险降低到 5%。每个组需要 24 个中心,每个中心的集群大小至少为 200 次分娩,每组 12 个中心,才能达到 80%的功效和 5%的Ⅰ类错误概率(双侧)。我们假设最大的组内相关系数(ICC)值为 0.08。分析将根据意向治疗原则进行,并按教学或非教学医院进行分层。主要结果是干预后第一年期间的产科并发症数量。如果多学科团队培训被证明是有效的,将进行成本效益分析。

讨论

如果多学科团队培训具有成本效益,应将其纳入妇科医生的额外培训中。

试验注册

该方案已在临床试验注册编号 NTR1859 中注册。

相似文献

5
Cost-effectiveness of simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies (TOSTI study).
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
7
A cost-effective approach to simulation-based team training in obstetrics.
Nurs Womens Health. 2014 Dec;18(6):500-7. doi: 10.1111/1751-486X.12162.
8
Simulation-based crisis team training for multidisciplinary obstetric providers.
Simul Healthc. 2009 Summer;4(2):77-83. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31819171cd.
9
Multidisciplinary team training in a simulation setting for acute obstetric emergencies: a systematic review.
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;115(5):1021-1031. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d9f4cd.
10
Effect of obstetric team training on team performance and medical technical skills: a randomised controlled trial.
BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1387-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03436.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

3
The use of a stronger instructional design by implementing repetitive practice in simulation-based obstetric team training: trainees' satisfaction.
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Sep 3;6(5):284-288. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000434. eCollection 2020.
4
Multi-professional simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and trainees' performance.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 16;12(12):CD011545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011545.pub2.
7
The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life-threatening emergencies in hospital.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):CD012177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012177.pub2.
9
Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD000072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3.

本文引用的文献

3
Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome?
BJOG. 2006 Feb;113(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00800.x.
4
Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned?
JAMA. 2005 May 18;293(19):2384-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.19.2384.
5
The impact of aviation-based teamwork training on the attitudes of health-care professionals.
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Dec;199(6):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.08.021.
6
The future vision of simulation in health care.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-10. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i2.
7
Assessment of clinical performance during simulated crises using both technical and behavioral ratings.
Anesthesiology. 1998 Jul;89(1):8-18. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199807000-00005.
8
Functional anatomy of full-scale patient simulators.
J Clin Monit. 1997 Sep;13(5):317-24. doi: 10.1023/a:1007456108111.
9
Does training on an anaesthesia simulator lead to improvement in performance?
Br J Anaesth. 1994 Sep;73(3):293-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/73.3.293.
10
A flight simulator for general anesthesia training.
Comput Biomed Res. 1987 Feb;20(1):64-75. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(87)90019-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验