Environmental Engineering Division, Department of Hydraulic, Maritime and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Water Res. 2011 Jan;45(2):573-82. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.019. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
Sludge treatment wetlands (STW) emerge as a promising sustainable technology with low energy requirements and operational costs. In this study, technical, economic and environmental aspects of STW are investigated and compared with other alternatives for sludge management in small communities (<2000 population equivalent). The performance of full-scale STW was characterised during 2 years. Sludge dewatering increased total solids (TS) concentration by 25%, while sludge biodegradation lead to volatile solids around 45% TS and DRI(24h) between 1.1 and 1.4 gO(2)/kgTS h, suggesting a partial stabilisation of biosolids. In the economic and environmental assessment, four scenarios were considered for comparison: 1) STW with direct land application of biosolids, 2) STW with compost post-treatment, 3) centrifuge with compost post-treatment and 4) sludge transport to an intensive wastewater treatment plant. According to the results, STW with direct land application is the most cost-effective scenario, which is also characterised by the lowest environmental impact. The life cycle assessment highlights that global warming is a significant impact category in all scenarios, which is attributed to fossil fuel and electricity consumption; while greenhouse gas emissions from STW are insignificant. As a conclusion, STW are the most appropriate alternative for decentralised sludge management in small communities.
污泥处理湿地(STW)作为一种具有低能源需求和运营成本的有前途的可持续技术而出现。本研究调查了 STW 的技术、经济和环境方面,并将其与其他小型社区(<2000 人口当量)的污泥管理替代方案进行了比较。在两年的时间里对全规模 STW 的性能进行了表征。污泥脱水将总固体(TS)浓度提高了 25%,而污泥生物降解导致挥发性固体达到 TS 的 45%左右,DRI(24h)在 1.1 到 1.4 gO(2)/kgTS h 之间,表明生物固体部分稳定。在经济和环境评估中,考虑了四个方案进行比较:1)直接将生物固体施用于土地的 STW,2)经过堆肥后处理的 STW,3)经过离心处理和堆肥后处理的 STW,以及 4)将污泥输送到强化污水处理厂。根据结果,直接将生物固体施用于土地的 STW 是最具成本效益的方案,其环境影响也最低。生命周期评估强调,所有方案中全球变暖都是一个重要的影响类别,这归因于化石燃料和电力消耗;而 STW 的温室气体排放则微不足道。总之,STW 是小型社区分散式污泥管理的最合适替代方案。