Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Section of Anatomy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Exp Neurol. 2011 May;229(1):132-42. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.09.021. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
Olfactory ensheathing cells (OEC) have been shown to stimulate regeneration, myelination and functional recovery in different spinal cord injury models. However, recent reports from several laboratories have challenged this treatment strategy. The discrepancy in results could be attributed to many factors including variations in culture protocols. The present study investigates whether the differences in culture preparation could influence neuroprotective and growth-promoting effects of OEC after transplantation into the injured spinal cord. Primary OEC cultures were purified using method of differential cell adhesion (a-OEC) or separated with immunomagnetic beads (b-OEC). After cervical C4 hemisection in adult rats, short-term (3 weeks) or long-term (7 weeks) cultured OEC were transplanted into the lateral funiculus at 1mm rostral and caudal to the transection site. At 3-8 weeks after transplantation, labeled OEC were mainly found in the injection sites and in the trauma zone. Short-term cultured a-OEC supported regrowth of rubrospinal, raphaespinal and CGRP-positive fibers, and attenuated retrograde degeneration in the red nucleus. Short-term cultured b-OEC failed to promote axonal regrowth but increased the density of rubrospinal axons within the dorsolateral funiculus and provided significant neuroprotection for axotomized rubrospinal neurons. In addition, short-term cultured OEC attenuated sprouting of rubrospinal terminals. In contrast, long-term cultured OEC neither enhanced axonal growth nor prevented retrograde cell death. The results suggest that the age of OEC in culture and the method of cell purification could affect the efficacy of OEC to support neuronal survival and regeneration after spinal cord injury. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Understanding olfactory ensheathing glia and their prospect for nervous system repair.
嗅鞘细胞(OEC)已被证明可刺激不同脊髓损伤模型中的再生、髓鞘形成和功能恢复。然而,最近几个实验室的报告对这种治疗策略提出了质疑。结果的差异可能归因于许多因素,包括培养方案的变化。本研究探讨了培养前的差异是否会影响嗅鞘细胞移植入损伤脊髓后的神经保护和促生长作用。使用差速细胞黏附法(a-OEC)或免疫磁珠法(b-OEC)分离原代嗅鞘细胞进行培养。在成年大鼠颈 4 半切术后,将短期(3 周)或长期(7 周)培养的嗅鞘细胞移植至损伤部位的侧索,距横断端 1mm 处的近侧和远侧。移植后 3-8 周,标记的嗅鞘细胞主要位于注射部位和损伤区。短期培养的 a-OEC 支持红核脊髓束、舌下神经根和 CGRP 阳性纤维的再生,并减轻红核的逆行性变性。短期培养的 b-OEC 不能促进轴突再生,但增加了背外侧束中红核脊髓束轴突的密度,并为轴突切断的红核神经元提供了显著的神经保护。此外,短期培养的嗅鞘细胞还减弱了红核终末的发芽。相比之下,长期培养的嗅鞘细胞既不能增强轴突生长,也不能防止逆行性细胞死亡。这些结果表明,培养中嗅鞘细胞的年龄和细胞纯化方法可能会影响嗅鞘细胞在脊髓损伤后支持神经元存活和再生的效果。本文是一个特刊的一部分,特刊标题为:了解嗅鞘胶质细胞及其对神经系统修复的前景。