• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代心理健康计划的实施与评估。

Contemporary mental health program implementation and evaluation.

机构信息

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Emergency Department, Camperdown, Australia.

出版信息

Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Nov;31(11):716-22. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2010.503008.

DOI:10.3109/01612840.2010.503008
PMID:20936893
Abstract

Evaluation is a burgeoning field of health care program research. Experimental designs and meta-analyses have traditionally been considered the most suitable means of assessing program effectiveness. Qualitative methods also have been widely adopted. Mixed-methods designs have now emerged as a promising alternative. This paper highlights the key features of contemporary mental health program implementation and evaluation. Realistic Evaluation is identified as a relatively new methodology that is more concerned with a deeper process-oriented inquiry and appreciates that any program must be understood within the given context. Two projects applying Realistic Evaluation are cited to illustrate the value of this methodology to mental health program research.

摘要

评价是医疗保健项目研究中一个新兴的领域。实验设计和荟萃分析传统上被认为是评估项目效果最适宜的方法。定性方法也得到了广泛的采用。混合方法设计现在已经成为一种有前途的替代方法。本文强调了当代心理健康项目实施和评估的关键特征。现实评估被确定为一种相对较新的方法,更关注更深入的面向过程的探究,并认识到任何项目都必须在给定的背景下进行理解。引用了两个应用现实评估的项目来说明这种方法对心理健康项目研究的价值。

相似文献

1
Contemporary mental health program implementation and evaluation.当代心理健康计划的实施与评估。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Nov;31(11):716-22. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2010.503008.
2
Evaluation of a community mental health program.
Can J Nurs Adm. 1991 Jun;4(2):16-20.
3
Issues and approaches in evaluating managed mental health care.评估管理式心理健康护理中的问题与方法
Milbank Q. 1995;73(1):57-75.
4
Collaborative and workflow-oriented digital portfolio: Creating a web-based tool to support a nationwide program of practices evaluation in the blood transfusion area.协作式且面向工作流程的数字档案袋:创建一个基于网络的工具,以支持输血领域的全国性实践评估项目。
Int J Med Inform. 2007 May-Jun;76(5-6):383-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
5
Quality improvement activities and expanded school mental health services.质量改进活动与扩展的学校心理健康服务。
Behav Modif. 2004 Jul;28(4):596-616. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259518.
6
Building evaluation capacity: definitional and practical implications from an Australian case study.构建评估能力:来自澳大利亚一个案例研究的定义及实际影响
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Aug;30(3):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 May 6.
7
Evaluation of school-based health center programs and services: the whys and hows of demonstrating program effectiveness.基于学校的健康中心项目与服务评估:证明项目有效性的原因与方法
Nurs Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;40(4):711-24, x. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2005.07.008.
8
A framework for systematic evaluation of health information infrastructure progress in communities.社区卫生信息基础设施进展的系统评估框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Apr;40(2):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2006.01.002. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
9
Family planning operations research in Africa: reviewing a decade of experience.非洲的计划生育运筹学:回顾十年经验
Stud Fam Plann. 1991 Sep-Oct;22(5):279-93.
10
An evaluation of a school-based teenage pregnancy prevention program using a logic model framework.一项使用逻辑模型框架对基于学校的青少年怀孕预防项目的评估。
J Sch Nurs. 2007 Apr;23(2):104-10. doi: 10.1622/1059-8405(2007)023[0104:AEOAST]2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Australian perinatal and infant mental health navigation programme: evaluation protocol.澳大利亚围产期和婴儿心理健康导航计划:评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 5;13(6):e070067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070067.
2
Developing a good practice model to evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive primary health care in local communities.开发一个良好的实践模型,以评估当地社区综合初级卫生保健的有效性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 May 15;15:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-99.