Department of Speech Pathology & Audiology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688-0002, USA.
Int J Audiol. 2010 Nov;49(11):832-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.491096.
Acceptable noise level (ANL) test materials were digitally modified to create five reverberant conditions by applying different values of reverberation time (RT) to a non-reverberant condition (RT = 0, 0.4, 0.7, 1.2, and 2 s). Two groups of 12 subjects participated: younger individuals (22–29 years, M = 24.3) and older adults (50–69 years, M = 57.5). Mean hearing threshold levels (250 to 8000 Hz) for both groups were 30 dB HL or better. Most comfortable listening level (MCL) and background noise level (BNL) measurements were completed in each reverberant condition, and from these measurements, ANLs were calculated. Significant main effects for age and reverberation were not found for ANL or MCL. These results suggest that reverberation does not affect the amount of background noise individuals are willing to accept, or the level of speech individuals choose as the MCL. These results can be used by clinical audiologists to counsel patients regarding the use of communication strategies. Additionally, these results can be used to support previous findings that ANL is not related to the intelligibility of the speech signal.
可接受噪声级 (ANL) 测试材料经过数字修改,通过向无混响条件(混响时间 RT=0)施加不同的混响时间值 (RT=0.4、0.7、1.2 和 2 s) ,创建了五种混响条件。两组共 12 名受试者参与:年轻组(22-29 岁,M=24.3)和老年组(50-69 岁,M=57.5)。两组的平均听力阈值(250 至 8000 Hz)均为 30 dB HL 或更好。在每种混响条件下都完成了最舒适聆听级 (MCL) 和背景噪声级 (BNL) 的测量,并根据这些测量值计算了 ANL。对于 ANL 或 MCL,年龄和混响均未发现显著的主效应。这些结果表明,混响不会影响个体愿意接受的背景噪声量,也不会影响个体选择的言语作为 MCL 的水平。这些结果可被临床听力学家用于向患者提供有关使用沟通策略的建议。此外,这些结果还可以支持之前的发现,即 ANL 与语音信号的可懂度无关。