Department of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London UK.
BJOG. 2010 Nov;117(12):1504-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02705.x.
To compare patient goal achievement in prolapse and continence surgery with objective/subjective outcomes; secondarily, to compare patient goal achievement with overall satisfaction and with that of the surgeon.
Prospective longitudinal observational study, over 2 years.
Tertiary urogynaecology centre.
Women with prolapse or stress incontinence due for surgery.
Patients and surgeons listed five goals that they hoped to achieve following surgery. Objective assessment was with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) and videocystourethrography (VCU). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed with a Prolapse QoL questionnaire (PQoL), Kings Health questionnaire (KHQ) and Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS) and satisfaction was assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I).
Goal achievement was measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS); objective cure of prolapse by POP-Q and of stress incontinence by VCU; QoL was assessed by KHQ, PQoL and GRISS; and satisfaction by PGI-I.
Complete data were available for 112 women. POP-Q scores significantly improved (P<0.05); objective cure of incontinence (from VCU) was 88.8%. All QoL questionnaires and PGI-I scores showed significant improvement (P<0.01). Mean goal achievement was 85.1% for patients and 89.6% for surgeons. Patient goal achievement for prolapse surgery was observed sooner and correlated more with other measures of success than continence surgery. Continence-related goals based on symptom relief were achieved more than those based on body image and sexuality. Surgeons reported a high achievement rate in anatomical restoration and functional improvement goals.
Patient goal achievement correlates significantly with other measures of 'success' as well as with overall satisfaction. Surgeons and women have varying expectations of the outcome of surgery. Nearly 90% of goals are still achieved 2 years following surgery.
比较脱垂和控尿手术患者的目标达成情况与客观/主观结果;其次,比较患者的目标达成情况与总体满意度以及与外科医生的满意度。
前瞻性纵向观察研究,持续 2 年。
三级妇科泌尿科中心。
因脱垂或压力性尿失禁而接受手术的女性。
患者和外科医生列出了他们希望在手术后实现的五个目标。客观评估采用盆腔器官脱垂量化系统(POP-Q)和视频尿动力学检查(VCU)。生活质量(QoL)采用脱垂 QoL 问卷(PQoL)、King 健康问卷(KHQ)和 Golombok-Rust 性满意度量表(GRISS)评估,满意度采用患者总体印象改善量表(PGI-I)评估。
目标达成情况采用 100mm 视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量;POP-Q 评估脱垂的客观治愈率,VCU 评估压力性尿失禁的客观治愈率;QoL 采用 KHQ、PQoL 和 GRISS 评估;满意度采用 PGI-I 评估。
112 名女性的完整数据可用。POP-Q 评分显著改善(P<0.05);VCU 评估的尿失禁客观治愈率为 88.8%。所有 QoL 问卷和 PGI-I 评分均显示显著改善(P<0.01)。患者的平均目标达成率为 85.1%,外科医生的平均目标达成率为 89.6%。患者的脱垂手术目标达成更早,与其他成功衡量标准的相关性强于控尿手术。基于症状缓解的控尿相关目标的达成率高于基于身体形象和性的目标。外科医生报告在解剖学恢复和功能改善目标方面的实现率较高。
患者的目标达成情况与其他“成功”衡量标准以及总体满意度显著相关。外科医生和女性对手术结果的期望不同。术后 2 年,仍有近 90%的目标得以实现。