George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Child Maltreat. 2010 Nov;15(4):271-81. doi: 10.1177/1077559510380738.
Although a strong literature on child maltreatment re-reporting exists, much of that literature stops at the first re-report. The literature on chronic re-reporting, meaning reports beyond the second report, is scant. The authors follow Loman’s lead in focusing on reports beyond the first two to determine what factors predict these ‘‘downstream’’ report stages. Cross-sector, longitudinal administrative data are used. The authors analyze predictors at each of the first four recurrences (first to second report, second to third report, third to fourth report, and fourth to fifth report). Findings demonstrate that some factors (e.g., tract poverty) which predict initial recurrence lose their predictive value at later stages, whereas others (e.g., aid to families with dependent children history) remain predictive across stages. In-home child welfare services and mental health treatment emerged as consistent predictors of reduced recurrence.
尽管有关儿童虐待再报告的文献很多,但其中大部分文献仅停留在第一次再报告。关于慢性再报告(即第二次报告之后的报告)的文献则很少。作者遵循 Loman 的研究思路,重点关注第二次报告之后的报告,以确定哪些因素可以预测这些“下游”报告阶段。使用跨部门、纵向行政数据。作者分析了前四次复发(第一次到第二次报告、第二次到第三次报告、第三次到第四次报告和第四次到第五次报告)中的每个预测因素。研究结果表明,一些预测初始复发的因素(例如,贫困社区)在后期阶段失去了预测价值,而其他因素(例如,有受抚养子女家庭援助历史)在各个阶段仍然具有预测性。家庭内儿童福利服务和心理健康治疗是减少复发的一致预测因素。