Suppr超能文献

基于人群的前列腺根治性切除术切缘阳性的决定因素。

Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity.

机构信息

Division of Urologic Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1734-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09662.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

Abstract

STUDY TYPE

Prognosis (cohort).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Prior population and single-centre studies have assessed incidence of positive surgical margins. The current study derived population-based positive surgical margin cut-offs in order to help identify underperforming surgeons who may benefit from further courses and/or self study to improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize factors associated with positive surgical margins (PSMs) and derive population-based PSM cutoffs to evaluate surgeon performance in radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SEER-Medicare data were used to identify 4247 men diagnosed with prostate cancer during 2004-2005 who underwent RP up to 2006. We performed logistic regression to assess the impact of tumour characteristics, surgeon volume and surgical approach on the likelihood of PSMs for pT2 and PT3a disease. Moreover, we derived 25th and 10th percentile cutoffs from binomial distribution equations.

RESULTS

Overall, 19.4% of men experienced PSMs with a pT2 vs pT3a PSM rate of 14.9% vs 42% (P<0.001). Extrapolating from our population-based results, a surgeon incurring more than three PSMs in 10 cases of pT2 disease performed below the 25th percentile. There was a trend for fewer PSMs with minimally invasive vs open RP (17.4% vs 20.1%, P=0.086), and the PSM rate also decreased over the study period from 21.3% in 2004 to 16.6% in 2006 (P=0.028) with significant geographic variation (P<0.001). In adjusted analyses, temporal and geographic variation in PSM persisted, and men with high (odds ratio 3.68, 95% CI 2.82-4.81) and intermediate (odds ratio 2.52, 95% CI 2.03-3.13) vs low-risk disease were at greater odds to experience PSMs. Notably, neither surgical approach nor surgeon volume was significantly associated with PSMs.

CONCLUSION

Our population-based PSM benchmarks allow identification of under-performing outliers who may seek courses or video self-study to improve outcomes. There was significant temporal and geographic variation in PSMs but neither surgeon volume nor surgical approach was associated with PSMs.

摘要

研究类型

预后(队列)。

证据水平

2b. 关于这个主题已经知道了什么?本研究有什么补充?先前的人群和单中心研究已经评估了阳性手术切缘的发生率。本研究得出了基于人群的阳性手术切缘截止值,以帮助识别表现不佳的外科医生,他们可能受益于进一步的课程和/或自我学习以改善结果。

目的

描述与阳性手术切缘(PSM)相关的因素,并得出基于人群的 PSM 截止值,以评估根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中外科医生的表现。

患者和方法

使用 SEER-Medicare 数据确定了 4247 名在 2004-2005 年期间被诊断患有前列腺癌并在 2006 年之前接受过 RP 的男性患者。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以评估肿瘤特征、外科医生数量和手术方式对 pT2 和 pT3a 疾病发生 PSM 的可能性的影响。此外,我们从二项分布方程中得出了第 25 百分位和第 10 百分位的截止值。

结果

总体而言,19.4%的男性出现 PSM,pT2 与 pT3a 的 PSM 率分别为 14.9%和 42%(P<0.001)。从我们的人群基础结果推断,在 10 例 pT2 疾病中,有超过 3 例 PSM 的外科医生表现低于第 25 百分位。与开放 RP 相比,微创 RP 的 PSM 发生率较低(17.4%对 20.1%,P=0.086),并且在研究期间,PSM 率从 2004 年的 21.3%下降到 2006 年的 16.6%(P=0.028),具有显著的地理差异(P<0.001)。在调整分析中,PSM 的时间和地理变化仍然存在,高(优势比 3.68,95%置信区间 2.82-4.81)和中(优势比 2.52,95%置信区间 2.03-3.13)风险疾病的男性发生 PSM 的可能性更高。值得注意的是,手术方式和外科医生数量都与 PSM 无显著相关性。

结论

我们基于人群的 PSM 基准允许识别表现不佳的异常值,他们可能会寻求课程或视频自我学习以改善结果。PSM 存在显著的时间和地理差异,但外科医生数量和手术方式都与 PSM 无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验