• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在根治性前列腺切除术后,切缘阳性的高级别 Gleason 分级癌预示着生化失败,并且可能指导辅助放疗。

High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.

机构信息

Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(12):1794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x
PMID:21992536
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Study Type - Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Only 30-35% of patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy develop recurrent disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the rate of biochemical relapse or metastasis and improves overall survival after radical prostatectomy. Various pathological factors, such as location and extent of positive margins, have been proposed as possible prognostic factors in men with margin-positive prostate cancer, however, the recent International Society of Urological Pathology consensus meeting in Boston noted that there is limited data on the significance of Gleason grade of the carcinoma at a positive margin. The present study shows that the presence of high grade prostate cancer, i.e. Gleason pattern 4 or 5, at a positive surgical margin is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Moreover, patients with lower grade carcinoma at the margin have a similar prognosis to men with negative margins. Hence, assessment of Gleason grade at the site of positive margin may aid optimal selection of patients for adjuvant radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

• To establish predictors of biochemical recurrence by analysing the pathological characteristics of positive surgical margins (PSMs), including Gleason grade of the carcinoma at the involved margin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• Clinicopathological and outcome data on 940 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1997 and 2003 were collected. • Of these, 285 (30.3%) patients with PSMs were identified for pathological review, including assessment of location of margin, linear extent, number of PSMs, plane of margin and Gleason grade (3 vs 4 or 5) at the margin.

RESULTS

• At a median follow-up of 82 months, the biochemical recurrence rate of the PSM cohort was 29%. • On univariate analysis, the presence of Gleason grade 4 or 5 at the margin (34.4% of cases) was significantly associated with biochemical recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 2.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 1.82-4.32, P < 0.001) compared with the presence of Gleason grade 3. • Linear extent of margin involvement was also associated with recurrence (P= 0.009). • Single vs multiple margin involvement, location, and plane of the involved margin were not significant predictors of recurrence. • On multivariate analysis, Gleason grade 4 or 5 at the margin remained an independent predictor of recurrence (HR 2.14, 95% CI = 1.29-4.03, P= 0.003).

CONCLUSION

• The Gleason grade at the site of a PSM identifies patients at increased risk of biochemical recurrence and should aid stratification of patients for adjuvant radiation therapy.

摘要

背景

研究类型-预后(病例系列)证据水平 4 已知的是什么?研究增加了什么?仅 30-35%接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者在术后出现阳性切缘后会出现疾病复发。辅助放疗可降低生化复发或转移的发生率,并改善根治性前列腺切除术后的总生存率。各种病理因素,如阳性切缘的位置和范围,已被提出作为阳性切缘前列腺癌患者的可能预后因素,但最近在波士顿举行的国际泌尿病理学会共识会议指出,关于阳性切缘处癌的 Gleason 分级的意义数据有限。本研究表明,阳性切缘处存在高级别前列腺癌,即 Gleason 模式 4 或 5,是根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的独立预测因子。此外,切缘处有较低级别癌的患者与切缘阴性的患者具有相似的预后。因此,评估阳性切缘处的 Gleason 分级可能有助于为辅助放疗选择最佳患者。

目的

通过分析阳性手术切缘(PSM)的病理特征,包括受累切缘处的癌的 Gleason 分级,确定生化复发的预测因子。

患者和方法

收集了 1997 年至 2003 年间接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的 940 例患者的临床病理和结局数据。其中,对 285 例(30.3%)有 PSM 的患者进行了病理复查,包括切缘部位、线性范围、PSM 数量、切缘平面和 Gleason 分级(3 级与 4 级或 5 级)的评估。

结果

在中位随访 82 个月时,PSM 组的生化复发率为 29%。单因素分析显示,切缘处存在 Gleason 分级 4 或 5(占病例的 34.4%)与生化复发显著相关(风险比[HR]2.80,95%置信区间[CI]=1.82-4.32,P<0.001),而 Gleason 分级 3 级则无此关联。切缘受累的线性范围也与复发相关(P=0.009)。单处 vs 多处切缘受累、切缘位置和切缘平面不是复发的显著预测因素。多因素分析显示,Gleason 分级 4 或 5 在切缘处仍是复发的独立预测因子(HR 2.14,95%CI=1.29-4.03,P=0.003)。

结论

PSM 处的 Gleason 分级可识别出生化复发风险增加的患者,有助于对辅助放疗患者进行分层。

相似文献

1
High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.在根治性前列腺切除术后,切缘阳性的高级别 Gleason 分级癌预示着生化失败,并且可能指导辅助放疗。
BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(12):1794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
2
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
3
Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.在预测格里森 7 前列腺癌临床相关生化复发方面,阳性病理切缘的存在或缺失优于任何其他与切缘相关的变量。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):921-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11665.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
4
Defining pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.定义病理变量以预测根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性患者的生化失败:辅助放疗的意义。
BJU Int. 2010 May;105(10):1377-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08953.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
5
Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性:它们对生化或临床进展有影响吗?
BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(10):1413-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07791.x. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
6
External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.临床分期为T1-2期前列腺癌的体外放射治疗与根治性前列腺切除术:根据治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和活检Gleason评分分层的治疗意义
Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 Mar-Apr;3(2):78-87.
7
Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性患者中预测辅助放疗反应的因素的识别。
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1860-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000092503.45951.c2.
8
Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性长度作为生化复发的预测指标。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.139. Epub 2009 May 17.
9
Impact of a tertiary Gleason pattern 4 or 5 on clinical failure and mortality after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer.三级模式 4 或 5 的前列腺癌对局限性前列腺癌根治术后临床失败和死亡率的影响。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1489-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10583.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
10
Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate-risk disease.阳性切缘仅在中危疾病中是显著生化复发的危险因素。
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):821-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10868.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The perks of combining extension and Gleason score of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的扩展与Gleason评分相结合的益处。
World J Urol. 2025 Aug 10;43(1):481. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05806-y.
2
Impact of aspirin on biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after robot assisted radical prostatectomy in a multicenter retrospective cohort study.一项多中心回顾性队列研究:阿司匹林对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌生化复发的影响
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):2025. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86521-x.
3
Evaluating the effect of histopathological parameters of prostate adenocarcinoma on prognosis in radical prostatectomy specimens.
评估前列腺腺癌组织病理学参数对根治性前列腺切除术标本预后的影响。
Ann Saudi Med. 2024 Jul-Aug;44(4):234-248. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.234. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
4
The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘参数和病理分期对生化复发的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0301653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301653. eCollection 2024.
5
Association of Genomic Prostate Score at positive margin with recurrence after radical prostatectomy.阳性切缘处基因组前列腺评分与根治性前列腺切除术后复发的关系。
BJU Int. 2024 Dec;134(6):939-944. doi: 10.1111/bju.16445. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
6
Clinical outcomes for men with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy-results from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative community-based registry.前列腺癌根治术后手术切缘阳性男性的临床结局——来自南澳大利亚前列腺癌临床结局协作组社区登记处的结果
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):502-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
7
Value of three-dimensional visualization of preoperative prostatic magnetic resonance imaging based on measurements of anatomical structures in predicting positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.基于术前前列腺磁共振成像解剖结构测量的三维可视化对预测根治性前列腺切除术后阳性手术切缘的价值。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 4;14:1228892. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1228892. eCollection 2023.
8
Emerging Roles of Circulating Tumor DNA for Increased Precision and Personalization in Radiation Oncology.循环肿瘤 DNA 在放射肿瘤学中提高精准度和个性化的新兴作用。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jul;33(3):262-278. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.03.004.
9
Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性长度:大小是否重要?——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec;26(4):673-680. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00654-6. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
ERG Status at the Margin Is Associated With Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy With Positive Surgical Margins.在边缘处的 ERG 状态与切缘阳性的根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发相关。
Mod Pathol. 2023 Jul;36(7):100147. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100147. Epub 2023 Feb 22.