Department of Biology, Brandon University, Brandon, MB R7A6A9, Canada.
Fungal Biol. 2010 May-Jun;114(5-6):396-409. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
Catenulifera, typified by C. rhodogena (=Scopulariopsis rhodogena), was established to accommodate the anamorphs of Hyphodiscus (Ascomycota, Helotiales) and to delimit these taxa from members of Phialophora section Catenulatae. Catenulifera rhodogena has been inferred as monophyletic, but its relationship to ascomycetes with poorly differentiated phialidic anamorphs remains enigmatic. To test the hypothesis that C. rhodogena is closely related to morphologically similar species of Phialophora and to further explore the systematics of Catenulifera, we analyzed nuclear rDNA and β-tubulin gene sequences of isolates identified as C. rhodogena, Hyphodiscus hymeniophilus, P. brachyconia, P. brevicollaris and P. hyalina. ITS-LSU and ITS-LSU-β-tubulin phylogenies positioned all isolates except P. hyalina in a single, well-supported clade that consisted of three subclades. Subclade 1 included fungicolous isolates of C. rhodogena and H. hymeniophilus that did not fluoresce when exposed to long-wave UV light. Subclade 2 contained fungicolous and lignicolous strains of C. rhodogena that produced fluorescent colonies and possessed a 366bp indel in the LSU rRNA gene. Neither lineage encompassed the ex-type strains of Cistella rubescens (=H. hymeniophilus) or S. rhodogena, but the former isolate was inferred as sister to Subclade 2. Subclade 3 included all isolates of P. brachyconia, a species recognized here as C. brachyconia comb. nov. A fourth isolate of P. brachyconia that was extralimital to Subclade 3 is described as C. luxurians sp. nov. The positions of C. brevicollaris comb. nov., a species based on P. brevicollaris, and C. luxurians were not resolved in the ITS-LSU phylogeny. P. hyalina is not closely related to Catenulifera.
Catenulifera,以 C. rhodogena(=Scopulariopsis rhodogena)为模式种,被建立来容纳 Hyphodiscus(子囊菌门,Helotiales)的无性型,并将这些分类群与 Phialophora 节 Catenulatae 的成员区分开来。Catenulifera rhodogena 被推断为单系的,但它与形态上相似的 Phialophora 物种的关系仍然神秘。为了检验 C. rhodogena 与形态相似的 Phialophora 物种密切相关的假设,并进一步探索 Catenulifera 的系统发育,我们分析了鉴定为 C. rhodogena、Hyphodiscus hymeniophilus、P. brachyconia、P. brevicollaris 和 P. hyalina 的分离物的核 rDNA 和 β-微管蛋白基因序列。ITS-LSU 和 ITS-LSU-β-微管蛋白系统发育将除 P. hyalina 之外的所有分离物定位在一个由三个亚群组成的单系、支持良好的分支中。亚群 1 包括非荧光的 C. rhodogena 和 H. hymeniophilus 的真菌分离物,当暴露在长波紫外线光下时不会发出荧光。亚群 2 包含真菌和木质素的 C. rhodogena 菌株,这些菌株产生荧光菌落,并在 LSU rRNA 基因中具有 366bp 的插入缺失。这两个谱系都不包括 Cistella rubescens(=H. hymeniophilus)或 S. rhodogena 的模式株,但前者被推断为与亚群 2 姐妹。亚群 3 包括所有 P. brachyconia 的分离物,这里将其视为 C. brachyconia comb. nov. 亚群 3 之外的第四个 P. brachyconia 分离物被描述为 C. luxurians sp. nov. C. brevicollaris comb. nov.,基于 P. brevicollaris 的一个物种,以及 C. luxurians 在 ITS-LSU 系统发育中的位置没有解决。P. hyalina 与 Catenulifera 关系不密切。