Suppr超能文献

第一季放牧后采用不同寄生虫控制水平对第二季放牧牛的影响。

Performance of second-season grazing cattle following different levels of parasite control in their first grazing season.

机构信息

Department of Biomedicine and Veterinary Public Health, Section for Parasitology (SWEPAR), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 751 89 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Vet Parasitol. 2011 Jan 10;175(1-2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.018. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

Abstract

A 3-year grazing trial was performed during 2003-2005 on a commercial steer-producing farm in Sweden to study performance of second-season grazing (SSG) cattle following different levels of parasite exposure during their first grazing season. Initially, groups of 10 first-season grazing (FSG) cattle were each year assigned to four parasite control strategies: (1) turn-out onto pasture that during the previous year was grazed by SSG cattle, followed by a mid-July move to aftermath, (2) supplementation with concentrate and roughage for 4 weeks after turn-out, (3) no treatment, or (4) anthelmintic treatment (injectable doramectin) every fourth week. All animals were set stocked, except for those in group one. Next spring and following housing the cattle were turned out for their second grazing season onto approximately 25 ha communal pasturelands as a common mob. Weighing, faecal sampling and blood collection were performed at turn-out and then every 4 weeks for the 20-week grazing season. Faecal samples were also collected on day 10 after turn-out for detection of coccidian oocysts. Antibodies to Dictyocaulus viviparus were analysed at the time of their second housing period, and when elevated levels were recorded, stored serum samples from seropositive animals were analysed retrospectively. Results showed early-season weight losses of up to 47 kg in the SSG cattle. However, faecal egg counts were generally low and there was no correlation between SSG performance and treatment history as FSG cattle. Still, cumulative egg counts were significantly higher in animals that had been treated with anthelmintic as FSG cattle but serum pepsinogen concentrations showed no significant differences and the output of Eimeria alabamensis oocysts seldom exceeded 10,000 oocysts per gram faeces. Antibodies to D. viviparus were observed from July 2004 and from June 2005 but not in 2003. In 2004 and 2005, 64% and 83% of the animals, respectively, were seropositive for D. viviparus. It is concluded that weight gain penalties resulting from different levels of parasite infections the first grazing season remained during the second grazing season in 2004 and 2005 but no differences in weight gain could be identified in SSG cattle that had experienced different parasite control measures during their first grazing season. This was under conditions where the level of pasture infectivity was low to moderate during the second grazing period. However, D. viviparus was demonstrated in SSG animals during the two last years of the study and was an important confounding factor.

摘要

2003-2005 年,在瑞典的一个商业育肥牛场进行了为期 3 年的放牧试验,以研究在第一个放牧季节经历不同寄生虫暴露水平后,第二季放牧(SSG)牛的表现。最初,每年将 10 组第一季放牧(FSG)牛分为 4 种寄生虫控制策略:(1)在过去一年中放牧 SSG 牛的牧场上放牧,然后在 7 月中旬转移到牧场,(2)放牧后补充浓缩物和粗饲料 4 周,(3)不治疗,或(4)每 4 周进行一次驱虫治疗(注射多拉菌素)。除了第一组之外,所有动物都进行了设置放牧。第二年春天和之后,牛被关在圈舍里,然后在大约 25 公顷的公共牧场上进行第二季放牧,作为一个共同的牧群。放牧 20 周期间,在放牧时、每 4 周进行称重、粪便采样和血液采集。在放牧后第 10 天也收集粪便样本,以检测球虫卵囊。在第二季圈舍期间分析对网尾线虫的抗体,当记录到高水平时, retrospectively 分析来自血清阳性动物的储存血清样本。结果表明,SSG 牛在早期季节的体重损失高达 47 公斤。然而,粪便卵囊计数通常较低,并且 SSG 表现与 FSG 牛的治疗历史没有相关性。尽管如此,作为 FSG 牛进行驱虫治疗的动物的累计卵囊计数显着更高,但胃蛋白酶原浓度没有显着差异,并且艾美耳球虫卵囊的排出量很少超过粪便中每克 10,000 个卵囊。从 2004 年 7 月和 2005 年 6 月开始观察到对网尾线虫的抗体,但 2003 年没有。2004 年和 2005 年,分别有 64%和 83%的动物对网尾线虫呈血清阳性。结论是,2004 年和 2005 年,第一季放牧季节不同寄生虫感染水平导致的体重增加惩罚仍然存在,但在第一季放牧期间经历不同寄生虫控制措施的 SSG 牛中,体重增加没有差异。在第二季放牧期间,牧场感染性水平低至中等的情况下,结果就是这样。然而,在研究的最后两年中,在 SSG 动物中证明了网尾线虫的存在,这是一个重要的混杂因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验