Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Section for Parasitology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Sep 23;196(3-4):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.03.028. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
A three-year trial was performed in south-western Sweden to compare animal performance and levels of parasite control in three grazing groups, each with 18-24 first-season grazing (FSG) calves in similar set-stocked pasture enclosures. These groups were subjected to: (1) no parasite control (NT), (2) monthly repeated doramectin (Dectomax(®)) injections (SP), or (3) targeted selective weight gain-based anthelmintic treatments (TST) but only when individual calf performance was inferior to the average of the poorer 50% of those calves in group SP. In each year, weight and parasitological variables were measured at turn-out and then at predetermined intervals for 22-24 weeks during the grazing season. The dewormed calves in group SP had a higher average weight gain at housing (range 0.39-0.61 kg/day) than those in TST (0.36-0.50 kg/day), which in turn always exceeded the NT group (0.23-0.42 kg/day). This indicates that the parasite challenge in the NT group was sufficiently high to result in production loss. However, the average cumulative faecal egg counts (FEC) at housing in NT were in the range 1271-1953 eggs per gram faeces (epg) and in TST 1221-1968 epg. In contrast, parasite eggs were rarely recorded in group SP and then only during the first two years (on average 12 and 38 epg). There were also no significant differences in FEC or serum pepsinogen levels between FSG in groups NT and TST. The animals in SP received 7 doses of doramectin each year, whereas those in TST received an average of 0.5 doses. Thus, the TST approach represented a 92% reduction in anthelmintic use. The average weight gain in animals subjected to TST was always significantly lower than in animals dewormed regularly. In addition, there were no signs of short-term selection for anthelmintic resistance in the group SP animals, despite the fairly intensive use of injectable doramectin.
在瑞典西南部进行了一项为期三年的试验,比较了三个放牧组的动物性能和寄生虫控制水平,每个组有 18-24 头首次放牧(FSG)小牛,在相似的定置放牧围栏中。这些组分别接受以下处理:(1)无寄生虫控制(NT),(2)每月重复多拉菌素(Dectomax(®))注射(SP),或(3)基于靶向选择性体重增加的驱虫治疗(TST),但仅在个体小牛表现低于 SP 组中较差的 50%的小牛的平均水平时才进行。在每年的放牧季节,在放牧场和随后的 22-24 周内的预定间隔测量体重和寄生虫变量。驱虫组 SP 的小牛在圈舍时的平均增重较高(范围为 0.39-0.61kg/天),高于 TST 组(0.36-0.50kg/天),而 TST 组始终高于 NT 组(0.23-0.42kg/天)。这表明 NT 组的寄生虫挑战足以导致生产损失。然而,NT 组在圈舍时的平均累积粪便卵计数(FEC)范围为 1271-1953 个卵/克粪便(epg),而 TST 组为 1221-1968 epg。相比之下,SP 组很少记录到寄生虫卵,并且仅在前两年记录到(平均 12 和 38 epg)。NT 和 TST 组的 FSG 之间的 FEC 或血清胃蛋白酶原水平也没有显著差异。SP 组的动物每年接受 7 次多拉菌素,而 TST 组的动物平均接受 0.5 次。因此,TST 方法代表驱虫剂使用量减少了 92%。接受 TST 的动物的平均增重始终明显低于定期驱虫的动物。此外,尽管相当密集地使用了可注射的多拉菌素,但 SP 组的动物没有出现对驱虫剂产生耐药性的短期选择迹象。