Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl:S147-59. doi: 10.1177/0022146510383497.
Health reform efforts in the United States have focused on resolving some of the fundamental irrationalities of the system whereby costs and services utilization are often not linked to improved patient outcomes. Sociologists have contributed to these efforts by documenting the extent of problems and by confronting central questions around issues of accountability, reimbursement, and rationing that must be addressed in order to achieve meaningful reform that controls costs, expands access, and improves quality. Major reform rarely occurs without "paying off" powerful interests, a particularly difficult challenge in the context of a large and growing deficit. Central to achieving increased coverage and access, high quality, and cost control is change in reimbursement arrangements, increased accountability for both costs and outcomes, and criteria for rationing based on the evidence and accepted as legitimate by all stakeholders. Consensus about health reform requires trust. The traditional trust patients have in physicians provides an important base on which to build.
美国的医疗改革努力集中于解决该体系中一些基本的不合理性,在该体系中,成本和服务的利用往往与改善患者结果无关。社会学家通过记录问题的严重程度,以及直面问责制、报销和配给等核心问题,为这些努力做出了贡献,这些问题必须得到解决,才能实现有意义的改革,控制成本、扩大覆盖面和提高质量。如果不“满足”强大的利益,重大改革很少会发生,而在一个庞大且不断增长的赤字背景下,这是一个特别困难的挑战。要实现覆盖面和可及性的增加、高质量和成本控制,关键在于改变报销安排、提高成本和结果的问责制,以及基于证据和被所有利益攸关方认可的合法标准进行配给。医疗改革需要信任。患者对医生的传统信任为建立信任提供了重要基础。