Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu Universit, Jillyang, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, Republic of Korea.
Clin Rehabil. 2011 Feb;25(2):134-45. doi: 10.1177/0269215510380822. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
To compare the effect of visual and kinesthetic locomotor imagery training on walking performance and to determine the clinical feasibility of incorporating auditory step rhythm into the training.
Randomized crossover trial.
Laboratory of a Department of Physical Therapy.
Fifteen subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis.
Four locomotor imagery trainings on walking performance: visual locomotor imagery training, kinesthetic locomotor imagery training, visual locomotor imagery training with auditory step rhythm and kinesthetic locomotor imagery training with auditory step rhythm.
The timed up-and-go test and electromyographic and kinematic analyses of the affected lower limb during one gait cycle.
After the interventions, significant differences were found in the timed up-and-go test results between the visual locomotor imagery training (25.69 ± 16.16 to 23.97 ± 14.30) and the kinesthetic locomotor imagery training with auditory step rhythm (22.68 ± 12.35 to 15.77 ± 8.58) (P < 0.05). During the swing and stance phases, the kinesthetic locomotor imagery training exhibited significantly increased activation in a greater number of muscles and increased angular displacement of the knee and ankle joints compared with the visual locomotor imagery training, and these effects were more prominent when auditory step rhythm was integrated into each form of locomotor imagery training. The activation of the hamstring during the swing phase and the gastrocnemius during the stance phase, as well as kinematic data of the knee joint, were significantly different for posttest values between the visual locomotor imagery training and the kinesthetic locomotor imagery training with auditory step rhythm (P < 0.05).
The therapeutic effect may be further enhanced in the kinesthetic locomotor imagery training than in the visual locomotor imagery training. The auditory step rhythm together with the locomotor imagery training produces a greater positive effect in improving the walking performance of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis.
比较视觉和动觉想象训练对行走表现的影响,并确定将听觉步频纳入训练的临床可行性。
随机交叉试验。
物理治疗系实验室。
15 名脑卒中后患偏瘫者。
4 种行走想象训练:视觉运动想象训练、动觉运动想象训练、视觉运动想象训练加听觉步频和动觉运动想象训练加听觉步频。
计时起立行走测试和一个步态周期中患侧下肢的肌电图和运动学分析。
干预后,视觉运动想象训练(25.69±16.16 至 23.97±14.30)和动觉运动想象训练加听觉步频(22.68±12.35 至 15.77±8.58)的计时起立行走测试结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在摆动和站立阶段,与视觉运动想象训练相比,动觉运动想象训练表现出更大数量肌肉的激活和膝关节和踝关节的角度位移增加,并且当将听觉步频整合到每种运动想象训练中时,这些效果更加明显。摆动阶段的腘绳肌激活和站立阶段的腓肠肌激活,以及膝关节的运动学数据,在视觉运动想象训练和动觉运动想象训练加听觉步频的后测值之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。
动觉运动想象训练比视觉运动想象训练可能具有更强的治疗效果。听觉步频与运动想象训练相结合,对改善脑卒中后偏瘫患者的行走表现有更大的积极作用。