Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand; Department of Physiotherapy, University of Medical Technology, Mandalay, Myanmar.
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
J Rehabil Med. 2022 Jul 27;54:jrm00297. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.1390.
To compare the effect of motor imagery combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy vs health education combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy on dynamic balance, endurance, and functional mobility in post-stroke individuals.
Randomized controlled trial.
A total of 40 post-stroke individuals were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group was trained using motor imagery combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy, while the control group received health education combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy, 3 times a week for 4 weeks with an overall of 12 sessions. Outcomes included the step test for affected and unaffected limbs, the 6-Minute Walk Test, and the Timed Up and Go test. Assessments were performed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after the intervention Results: There were significant effects (p < 0.05) of: group on the step test for unaffected limb; of time on all outcomes; and of their interaction effect on the step test for affected limb, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Timed Up and Go test. Inter-group comparison showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the step test for unaffected limb at 2 weeks after the intervention. At 4 weeks after the intervention, significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in the step test for affected and unaffected limbs and in the Timed Up and Go test.
Motor imagery combined with structured progressive circuit class therapy was more effective on the step test, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Timed Up and Go test than training with structured progressive circuit class therapy alone. This suggest that that motor imagery should be incorporated into training programmes for restoring dynamic balance, endurance, and functional mobility in post-stroke individuals.
比较运动想象联合结构化渐进式回路训练与健康教育联合结构化渐进式回路训练对脑卒中后个体动态平衡、耐力和功能移动能力的影响。
随机对照试验。
共纳入 40 例脑卒中患者,随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组采用运动想象联合结构化渐进式回路训练,对照组采用健康教育联合结构化渐进式回路训练,每周 3 次,共 4 周,共 12 次。结果包括患侧和健侧步距测试、6 分钟步行测试和计时起立行走测试。在基线、干预 2 周和 4 周时进行评估。
组间在健侧步距测试中存在显著差异(p<0.05);时间在所有结果中均存在显著影响(p<0.05);交互作用在患侧步距测试、6 分钟步行测试和计时起立行走测试中也存在显著影响(p<0.05)。组间比较显示,干预 2 周后健侧步距测试存在显著差异(p<0.05)。干预 4 周后,患侧和健侧步距测试以及计时起立行走测试均存在显著差异(p<0.05)。
与单纯进行结构化渐进式回路训练相比,运动想象联合结构化渐进式回路训练在步距测试、6 分钟步行测试和计时起立行走测试中更有效,这提示运动想象应纳入脑卒中后个体动态平衡、耐力和功能移动能力的恢复训练方案中。