University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Oct;10(10):40-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.519238.
Detection of deception and confirmation of truth telling with conventional polygraphy raised a host of technical and ethical issues. Recently, newer methods of recording electromagnetic signals from the brain show promise in permitting the detection of deception or truth telling. Some are even being promoted as more accurate than conventional polygraphy. While the new technologies raise issues of personal privacy, acceptable forensic application, and other social issues, the focus of this paper is the technical limitations of the developing technology. Those limitations include the measurement validity of the new technologies, which remains largely unknown. Another set of questions pertains to the psychological paradigms used to model or constrain the target behavior. Finally, there is little standardization in the field, and the vulnerability of the techniques to countermeasures is unknown. Premature application of these technologies outside of research settings should be resisted, and the social conversation about the appropriate parameters of its civil, forensic, and security use should begin.
传统测谎仪在检测欺骗和确认真实陈述方面引发了一系列技术和伦理问题。最近,记录大脑电磁信号的新方法显示出在检测欺骗或真实陈述方面有很大的潜力。一些方法甚至被宣传为比传统测谎仪更准确。虽然新技术引发了个人隐私、可接受的法医应用和其他社会问题,但本文的重点是发展中的技术的技术局限性。这些限制包括新技术的测量有效性,这在很大程度上是未知的。另一组问题涉及用于模拟或限制目标行为的心理范式。最后,该领域几乎没有标准化,而且技术对对策的脆弱性也不得而知。应该抵制在研究环境之外过早地应用这些技术,应该开始就其在民事、法医和安全用途的适当参数进行社会对话。