Watkins Katherine E, Keyser Donna J, Smith Brad, Mannle Thomas E, Kivlahan Daniel R, Paddock Susan M, Mattox Teryn, Horvitz-Lennon Marcela, Pincus Harold Alan
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
J Healthc Qual. 2010 Nov-Dec;32(6):33-42; quiz 42-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00109.x. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
In this paper we present the conceptual framework and research design of a national evaluation of the quality of mental healthcare provided to veterans by the Veterans Health Administration, and present results on the reported availability of evidence-based practices. We used the Donabedian paradigm to design a longitudinal evaluation of the quality of mental healthcare. To evaluate the structure of care we used a combination of survey and administrative data and designed a web-based facility survey to examine the availability and characteristics of 12 evidence-based practices and other mental health services. We identified 138 unique facilities that provided mental healthcare to 783,280 veterans. With the exception of opiate substitution therapies, every evidence-based practice was reported in at least one location in each service network. We use maps to estimate the maximum number of veterans that might benefit from expanding the availability of an evidence-based practice. We demonstrate the feasibility of overcoming several major challenges typically associated with measuring the quality of healthcare systems. This framework for evaluation of mental healthcare delivery provides a model upon which other stakeholders can continue to build and expand.
在本文中,我们展示了对退伍军人健康管理局为退伍军人提供的精神卫生保健质量进行全国评估的概念框架和研究设计,并呈现了关于循证实践报告可用性的结果。我们使用唐纳贝迪安范式设计了一项对精神卫生保健质量的纵向评估。为了评估护理结构,我们结合了调查数据和行政数据,并设计了一项基于网络的机构调查,以检查12种循证实践及其他心理健康服务的可用性和特征。我们确定了138个为783,280名退伍军人提供精神卫生保健的独特机构。除阿片类药物替代疗法外,每个服务网络中至少有一个地点报告了每种循证实践。我们使用地图来估计通过扩大循证实践的可用性可能受益的退伍军人的最大数量。我们证明了克服通常与衡量医疗保健系统质量相关的几个主要挑战的可行性。这种精神卫生保健提供评估框架为其他利益相关者继续构建和扩展提供了一个模型。