Suppr超能文献

英国临床能力倾向测试是否提高了医学生选拔的效果?

Has the UK Clinical Aptitude Test improved medical student selection?

机构信息

School of Medical Sciences, Department of Education Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2010 Nov;44(11):1069-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03792.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In 2006, the United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) was introduced as a new medical school admissions tool. The aim of this cohort study was to determine whether the UKCAT has made any improvements to the way medical students are selected.

METHODS

Regression analysis was performed in order to study the ability of previous school type and gender to predict UKCAT, personal statement or interview scores in two cohorts of accepted students. The ability of admissions scores and demographic data to predict performance on knowledge and skills examinations was also studied.

RESULTS

Previous school type was not a significant predictor of either interview or UKCAT scores amongst students who had been accepted onto the programme (n = 307). However, it was a significant predictor of personal statement score, with students from independent and grammar schools performing better than students from state-maintained schools. Previous school type, personal statements and interviews were not significant predictors of knowledge examination performance. UKCAT scores were significant predictors of knowledge examination performance for all but one examination administered in the first 2 years of medical school. Admissions data explained very little about performance on skills (objective structured clinical examinations [OSCEs]) assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of personal statements as a basis for selection results in a bias towards students from independent and grammar schools. However, no evidence was found to suggest that students accepted from these schools perform any better than students from maintained schools on Year 1 and 2 medical school examinations. Previous school type did not predict interview or UKCAT scores of accepted students. UKCAT scores are predictive of Year 1 and 2 examination performance at this medical school, whereas interview scores are not. The results of this study challenge claims made by other authors that aptitude tests do not have a place in medical school selection in the UK.

摘要

目的

2006 年,英国临床能力倾向测验(UKCAT)被引入作为一种新的医学院招生工具。本队列研究旨在确定 UKCAT 是否对医学生的选拔方式有所改进。

方法

为了研究先前学校类型和性别对两个接受学生队列的 UKCAT、个人陈述或面试成绩的预测能力,进行了回归分析。还研究了招生成绩和人口统计学数据对知识和技能考试成绩的预测能力。

结果

在被该项目录取的学生(n=307)中,先前的学校类型并不是面试或 UKCAT 成绩的显著预测因素。然而,它是个人陈述成绩的一个显著预测因素,来自独立学校和文法学校的学生表现优于来自国立学校的学生。先前的学校类型、个人陈述和面试并不是知识考试成绩的显著预测因素。UKCAT 成绩是所有知识考试成绩的显著预测因素,除了医学生前两年的一次考试。招生数据对技能(客观结构化临床考试[OSCEs])评估的表现解释很少。

结论

将个人陈述作为选拔的基础,导致偏向于来自独立学校和文法学校的学生。然而,没有证据表明从这些学校录取的学生在医学生前两年的考试中比国立学校的学生表现更好。先前的学校类型并不能预测被录取学生的面试或 UKCAT 成绩。UKCAT 成绩可预测本校一年级和二年级的考试成绩,而面试成绩则不能。本研究的结果对其他作者提出的英国医学院选拔中不适合使用能力倾向测验的说法提出了挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验