• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从创新扩散的角度看癌症筛查的采用不平等:识别晚期采用者。

Inequalities in adoption of cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective: identification of late adopters.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Management, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University, Shinchang-myun, Asan-si, Choongchungnam-do 336-745, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;35(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2010.08.009
PMID:20947463
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although national-level organized cancer screening programs have reduced barriers to screening for people of low socioeconomic status, barriers to early screening remain. Our aim was to determine the diffusion pattern and identify the factors associated with early participation in stomach and breast cancer screening programs.

METHODS

The study population was derived from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, conducted in 2007. A stratified random sample of people aged 40 years and older from a nationwide population-based database was gathered in Korea (n=1,517) in 2007. Time of participation in early screening was defined as the number of years that had elapsed between the participant's 30th birthday and the age at first screening.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in the probability of adopting stomach and breast cancer screening in relation to education, household income, and job level. Results from Cox's proportional hazard model indicated that higher household income was significantly associated with an increased probability of adopting stomach cancer screening earlier (p<0.05), and people with high household incomes were more likely to adopt breast cancer screening earlier than were those with incomes under US$1,500 per month (p<0.01). When considered at a significance level of 0.1, we found that the most highly educated women were more likely than the least educated to be screened early.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite organized governmental screening programs, there are still inequalities in the early adoption of cancer screening. The results of this study also suggest that inequalities in early adoption may affect participation in regular screening.

摘要

背景

尽管国家级有组织的癌症筛查计划已经降低了经济社会地位较低人群的筛查障碍,但早期筛查仍然存在障碍。我们的目的是确定早期参与胃癌和乳腺癌筛查计划的扩散模式,并确定与早期参与相关的因素。

方法

研究人群来自于 2007 年进行的韩国国家癌症筛查调查。从韩国全国人口基础数据库中抽取年龄在 40 岁及以上的分层随机样本(n=1517)。早期筛查的参与时间定义为参与者 30 岁生日与首次筛查年龄之间的年数。

结果

在接受胃癌和乳腺癌筛查的概率方面,教育程度、家庭收入和工作水平存在显著差异。Cox 比例风险模型的结果表明,较高的家庭收入与更早地采用胃癌筛查的概率显著相关(p<0.05),家庭收入较高的人群比每月收入低于 1500 美元的人群更早地采用乳腺癌筛查(p<0.01)。在显著性水平为 0.1 时,我们发现受教育程度最高的女性比受教育程度最低的女性更有可能进行早期筛查。

结论

尽管有组织的政府筛查计划,但在早期接受癌症筛查方面仍存在不平等现象。本研究的结果还表明,早期参与的不平等可能会影响定期筛查的参与。

相似文献

1
Inequalities in adoption of cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective: identification of late adopters.从创新扩散的角度看癌症筛查的采用不平等:识别晚期采用者。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;35(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
2
Inequalities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in the Trent region, and implications for the NHS Breast Screening Programme.特伦特地区乳腺癌诊断分期的不平等现象及其对英国国民健康服务体系乳腺癌筛查计划的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2009 Sep;31(3):398-405. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp042. Epub 2009 May 7.
3
Long-term inequalities in breast cancer survival--a ten year follow-up study of patients managed within a National Health Care System (Sweden).乳腺癌生存的长期不平等——对瑞典国家医疗保健系统内接受治疗的患者进行的十年随访研究
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(2):216-24. doi: 10.1080/02841860701769768.
4
Breast, colon, and prostate screening in the adult population of Croatia: does rural origin matter?克罗地亚成年人群中的乳腺癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌筛查:农村出身有影响吗?
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;7(3):749. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
5
Dissemination of a breast and cervical cancer early detection program through a network of community-based organizations.通过社区组织网络开展乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目。
Health Promot Pract. 2010 Sep;11(5):654-64. doi: 10.1177/1524839908325064. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
6
Trends in socioeconomic disparities in organized and opportunistic gastric cancer screening in Korea (2005-2009).韩国(2005-2009 年)有组织的和机会性胃癌筛查的社会经济差异趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Aug;19(8):1919-26. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1308. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
7
SISMAMA--implementation of an information system for breast cancer early detection programs in Brazil.SISMAMA——巴西乳腺癌早期检测项目信息系统的实施。
Breast. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 2:S35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.02.001.
8
Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries.22个欧洲国家的健康方面的社会经济不平等现象。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 5;358(23):2468-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0707519.
9
Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987-2000).从创新扩散视角审视癌症筛查障碍的全人群趋势(1987 - 2000年)
Prev Med. 2004 Mar;38(3):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.10.011.
10
How to enhance physician and public acceptance and utilisation of colon cancer screening recommendations.如何提高医生和公众对结肠癌筛查建议的接受度和利用率。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):509-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics associated with early vs. late adoption of lung cancer screening.与肺癌筛查早期采用和晚期采用相关的特征。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jul 7;44:102820. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102820. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Primary human papillomavirus testing by clinician- versus self-collection: Awareness and acceptance among cervical cancer screening-eligible women.临床医生采集与自我采集的原发性人乳头瘤病毒检测:宫颈癌筛查合格女性的认知和接受度。
J Med Screen. 2024 Dec;31(4):223-231. doi: 10.1177/09691413241260019. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
3
Underuse of Gastric Cancer Screening Services among Koreans with Type 2 Diabetes.
2型糖尿病韩国人中胃癌筛查服务利用不足
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 23;11(7):927. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11070927.
4
Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Cancer Screening Behavior: Evidence from Japan.金融知识、金融教育与癌症筛查行为:来自日本的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;19(8):4457. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084457.
5
The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia.区域筛查政策对比利时癌症筛查参与率普及的影响:佛兰德斯和瓦隆地区教育不平等的时间趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3746-x.
6
To switch or not to switch: Intentions to switch to injectable PrEP among gay and bisexual men with at least twelve months oral PrEP experience.是否转换:至少有 12 个月口服 PrEP 经验的男同性恋和双性恋男性对转为注射用 PrEP 的意向。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0200296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200296. eCollection 2018.
7
Cancer screening in Koreans: a focus group approach.韩国的癌症筛查:一种焦点小组方法。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 14;18(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5147-9.
8
Early Adoption of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.早期采用多靶点粪便DNA检测进行结直肠癌筛查。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 May;92(5):726-733. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.019.
9
Gender Differences in Elders' Participation in the National Cancer Screening Program: Evidence from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010-12.老年人参与国家癌症筛查项目的性别差异:来自2010 - 2012年韩国国民健康与营养检查调查的证据
Iran J Public Health. 2015 Sep;44(9):1176-86.
10
Social inequalities and cancer: can the European deprivation index predict patients' difficulties in health care access? a pilot study.社会不平等与癌症:欧洲贫困指数能否预测患者在获得医疗服务方面的困难?一项试点研究。
Oncotarget. 2016 Jan 5;7(1):1055-65. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6274.