Suppr超能文献

基底神经节-丘脑皮质环路:运动、动眼、“前额叶”及“边缘系统”功能的并行基质。

Basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, "prefrontal" and "limbic" functions.

作者信息

Alexander G E, Crutcher M D, DeLong M R

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.

出版信息

Prog Brain Res. 1990;85:119-46.

PMID:2094891
Abstract

The central theme of the "segregated circuits" hypothesis is that structural convergence and functional integration occurs within, rather than between, each of the identified circuits. Admittedly, the anatomical evidence upon which this scheme is based remains incomplete. The hypothesis continues to be predicated largely on comparisons of anterograde and retrograde labeling studies carried out in different sets of animals. Only in the case of the "motor" circuit has evidence for the continuity of the loop been demonstrated directly in individual subjects; for the other circuits, such continuity is inferred from comparisons of data on different components of each circuit obtained in separate experiments. Because of the marked compression of pathways leading from cortex through basal ganglia to thalamus, comparisons of projection topography across experimental subjects may be hazardous. Definitive tests of the hypothesis of maintained segregation await additional double- and multiple-label tract-tracing experiments wherein the continuity of one circuit, or the segregation of adjacent circuits, can be examined directly in individual subjects. It is worthy of note, however, that the few studies to date that have employed this methodology have generated results consistent with the segregated circuits hypothesis. Moreover, single cell recordings in behaving animals have shown striking preservation of functional specificity at the level of individual neurons throughout the "motor" and "oculomotor" circuits. It is difficult to imagine how such functional specificity could be maintained in the absence of strict topographic specificity within the sequential projections that comprise these two circuits. This is not to say, however, that we expect the internal structure of functional channels (e.g., the "arm" channel within the "motor" circuit) to have cable-like, point-to-point topography. When the grain of analysis is sufficiently fine, anatomical studies have shown repeatedly that the terminal fields of internuclear projections (e.g., to striatum, pallidum, nigra, thalamus, etc.) often appear patchy and highly divergent, suggesting that neighboring groups of projection cells tend to influence interdigitating clusters of postsynaptic neurons. While more intricate and complex than simple point-to-point topography, however, this type arrangement should also be capable of maintaining functional specificity. As discussed briefly above, it is not yet clear to what extent the inputs to the "motor" circuit from the different precentral motor fields (e.g., MC, SMA, APA) are integrated in their passage through the circuit. It now appears that at the level of the putamen such inputs remain segregated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

“分离回路”假说的核心主题是,结构汇聚和功能整合发生在每个已确定的回路内部,而非回路之间。诚然,该假说所依据的解剖学证据仍不完整。这一假说很大程度上仍然基于对不同组动物进行的顺行和逆行标记研究的比较。只有在“运动”回路的情况下,才在个体受试者中直接证明了回路的连续性;对于其他回路,这种连续性是从在单独实验中获得的每个回路不同组成部分的数据比较中推断出来的。由于从皮层经基底神经节到丘脑的通路明显压缩,跨实验对象的投射拓扑比较可能存在风险。对维持分离假说的决定性检验有待于更多的双标记和多标记示踪实验,在这些实验中,可以直接在个体受试者中检查一个回路的连续性或相邻回路的分离情况。然而,值得注意的是,迄今为止采用这种方法的少数研究产生了与分离回路假说一致的结果。此外,对行为动物的单细胞记录表明,在整个“运动”和“动眼神经”回路中,单个神经元水平上的功能特异性得到了显著保留。很难想象在构成这两个回路的连续投射中没有严格的拓扑特异性的情况下,这种功能特异性如何能够维持。然而,这并不是说我们期望功能通道的内部结构(例如,“运动”回路中的“手臂”通道)具有类似电缆的点对点拓扑结构。当分析粒度足够精细时,解剖学研究反复表明,核间投射的终末场(例如,到纹状体、苍白球、黑质、丘脑等)往往呈现斑片状且高度分散,这表明相邻的投射细胞群倾向于影响突触后神经元的交错簇。然而,虽然这种排列比简单的点对点拓扑结构更复杂,但也应该能够维持功能特异性。如上文简要讨论过的,来自不同中央前运动区(例如,运动皮层、辅助运动区、前运动区)的“运动”回路输入在通过该回路时整合的程度尚不清楚。现在看来,在壳核水平上,这些输入仍然是分离的。(摘要截选至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验