Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):731-7. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.JNS10646. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
The management of parasagittal and falcine meningiomas centers around the relationship between the tumor and the venous anatomy of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) and the bridging veins. The present study aims to address surgical outcomes in a focused cohort of these patients for which there is not clinical equipoise between radiosurgery and transcranial resection.
The clinical outcomes of patients undergoing surgical removal of parasagittal and falcine meningiomas at the authors' institution over an 18-year period were analyzed. Analysis was limited to patients with large, symptomatic, or rapidly growing tumors, for whom radiosurgery was not a good option. Tumor control was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and specific attention was paid to the relationship between the tumor and the SSS, and its impact on tumor control and outcome.
The authors identified 135 patients with large, symptomatic, and/or growing parasagittal/falcine meningiomas who underwent resection at their institution between 1991 and 2007. The median length of follow-up was 7.6 years (range 1.7-18.6 years). The SSS was found to be invaded in 61 of 135 cases. In 6 cases the sinus was completely occluded. In 33 of the remaining 55 cases, the tumor invading the sinus was able to be removed with simple microsurgical techniques. There was no difference in rates of tumor control in patients who received subtotal resection for a WHO Grade I tumor, followed by close observation, compared with those undergoing gross-total resection, primarily because no cases were observed in which the tumor remnant in the SSS demonstrated interval growth on serial imaging studies. Of the patients in this series, 19% experienced at least one neurological, medical, or surgical complication.
Importantly, these data provide a more modern estimate of the expected outcomes that can be obtained with treatment of these tumors, in which a combination of image guidance, advanced microsurgical tools, and conformal radiation treatments is used.
矢状窦旁和镰旁脑膜瘤的治疗主要围绕肿瘤与上矢状窦(SSS)及其桥静脉的静脉解剖结构之间的关系展开。本研究旨在关注一组特定的患者,对于这些患者,放射外科和开颅切除术之间没有临床平衡。
作者分析了在 18 年期间于其所在机构接受矢状窦旁和镰旁脑膜瘤手术切除的患者的临床结果。分析仅限于那些肿瘤较大、症状明显或生长迅速的患者,因为这些患者不适合放射外科治疗。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估肿瘤控制情况,并特别关注肿瘤与 SSS 的关系及其对肿瘤控制和结果的影响。
作者确定了 1991 年至 2007 年期间在其所在机构接受切除治疗的 135 例大型、症状性和/或生长性矢状窦旁/镰旁脑膜瘤患者。中位随访时间为 7.6 年(范围 1.7-18.6 年)。发现 135 例中有 61 例 SSS 受侵犯。在 6 例中,窦完全闭塞。在其余 55 例中,有 33 例肿瘤侵犯窦,可以通过简单的显微外科技术切除。对于接受 WHO 分级 I 肿瘤次全切除并密切观察的患者,与接受大体全切除的患者相比,肿瘤控制率没有差异,主要是因为在 SSS 中的肿瘤残余物在连续影像学研究中没有显示出间隔生长的病例。在本系列患者中,19%的患者至少经历了一次神经、医学或手术并发症。
重要的是,这些数据提供了一个更现代的估计,即使用图像引导、先进的显微外科工具和适形放射治疗等综合方法治疗这些肿瘤可以获得的预期结果。