• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理中的物理治疗运动:一项随机对照试验。

Community based physiotherapeutic exercise in COPD self-management: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2011 Mar;105(3):418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.09.017. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2010.09.017
PMID:20951018
Abstract

Little is known about effects of community-based physiotherapeutic exercise programmes incorporated in COPD self-management programmes. In a randomised trial, the effect of such a programme (COPE-active) on exercise capacity and various secondary outcomes including daily activity as a marker of behaviour change was evaluated. All patients attended four 2-h self-management sessions. In addition the intervention group participated in the COPE-active programme offered by physiotherapists of private practices, consisting of a 6-month "compulsory" period (3 sessions/week) and subsequently a 5-month "optional" period (2 sessions/week). Because COPE-active was intended to change behaviour with regard to exercise, one session/week in both periods consisted of unsupervised home-based exercise training. Of 153 patients, 74 intervention and 68 control patients completed the one-year follow-up. Statistically significant between-group differences in incremental shuttle walk test-distance (35.1 m; 95% CI (8.4; 61.8)) and daily activity (1190 steps/day; 95% CI (256; 2125)) were found in favour of the intervention group. Over the 12-month period a significant difference of the chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ) dyspnoea-score (0.33 points; 95% CI (0.01; 0.64)) and a non-significant difference of the endurance shuttle walk test (135 m (95% CI (-29; 298)) was found. No differences were found in the other CRQ-components, anxiety and depression scores and percentage of fat free mass. This study demonstrates that a community-based reactivation programme improves exercise capacity in patients with moderately to severe COPD. Even more important, the programme improves actual daily activity after one-year which indicates behaviour change with regard to daily exercise. Registered trail number: ISRCTN81447311.

摘要

关于纳入 COPD 自我管理计划中的基于社区的物理治疗运动计划的效果知之甚少。在一项随机试验中,评估了这样一个计划(COPE-active)对运动能力和各种次要结果的影响,包括作为行为改变标志物的日常活动。所有患者都参加了四个 2 小时的自我管理课程。此外,干预组还参加了由私人执业物理治疗师提供的 COPE-active 计划,该计划包括 6 个月的“强制性”期(每周 3 次)和随后的 5 个月的“可选”期(每周 2 次)。由于 COPE-active 旨在改变与运动相关的行为,因此在两个时期中,每周有一次课程是基于家庭的无监督运动训练。在 153 名患者中,74 名干预组和 68 名对照组患者完成了为期一年的随访。与对照组相比,干预组在增量穿梭步行测试距离(35.1m;95%CI(8.4;61.8))和日常活动(1190 步/天;95%CI(256;2125))方面存在统计学显著差异。在 12 个月期间,慢性呼吸问卷(CRQ)呼吸困难评分(0.33 分;95%CI(0.01;0.64))存在显著差异,耐力穿梭步行测试(135m(95%CI(-29;298)))无显著差异。在其他 CRQ 成分、焦虑和抑郁评分以及无脂肪质量百分比方面没有差异。这项研究表明,基于社区的再激活计划可提高中重度 COPD 患者的运动能力。更重要的是,该计划在一年后可提高实际日常活动量,表明在日常运动方面的行为发生了变化。注册试验编号:ISRCTN81447311。

相似文献

1
Community based physiotherapeutic exercise in COPD self-management: a randomised controlled trial.基于社区的慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理中的物理治疗运动:一项随机对照试验。
Respir Med. 2011 Mar;105(3):418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.09.017. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
2
A community-based exercise programme in COPD self-management: two years follow-up of the COPE-II study.一项基于社区的慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理运动计划:COPE-II研究的两年随访
Respir Med. 2014 Oct;108(10):1481-90. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
3
Relationship between daily physical activity and exercise capacity in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的日常体力活动与运动能力之间的关系。
Respir Med. 2013 Feb;107(2):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.09.018. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
4
An integrated programme after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: effect on emotional and functional dimensions of quality of life.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复治疗后的综合方案:对生活质量的情绪和功能维度的影响。
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Feb;24(2):122-36. doi: 10.1177/0269215509346088. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
5
Two different training programmes for patients with COPD: a randomised study with 1-year follow-up.针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的两种不同训练方案:一项为期1年随访的随机研究。
Respir Med. 2006 Jan;100(1):130-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.03.043.
6
Maintaining exercise capacity and quality of life following pulmonary rehabilitation.肺康复后维持运动能力和生活质量。
Respirology. 2006 Jan;11(1):98-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00791.x.
7
Pulmonary rehabilitation after acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients who previously completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重后曾完成肺康复计划患者的肺康复。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):318-24. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181ac7bb8.
8
Pulmonary rehabilitation reduces depression and enhances health-related quality of life in COPD patients--especially in patients with mild or moderate disease.肺康复可降低 COPD 患者的抑郁程度,提高其健康相关生活质量,尤其是在轻度或中度疾病患者中。
Chron Respir Dis. 2010;7(4):229-37. doi: 10.1177/1479972310374343.
9
A randomised study of the effects of supplemental exercise sessions after a 7-week chronic obstructive pulmonary disease rehabilitation program.一项关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病康复计划7周后补充运动课程效果的随机研究。
Clin Respir J. 2012 Apr;6(2):112-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2011.00256.x. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
10
Maintaining benefits following pulmonary rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.维持肺康复治疗后获益:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Respir J. 2010 Mar;35(3):571-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00073609. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
What are the characteristics of outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who have reduced physical activity as a result of low-frequency pulmonary rehabilitation?因低频肺康复导致身体活动减少的慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊患者有哪些特征?
J Phys Ther Sci. 2025 Sep;37(9):460-465. doi: 10.1589/jpts.37.460. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
Changes in physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep following pulmonary rehabilitation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺康复后体力活动、久坐行为和睡眠的变化:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Apr 10;33(172). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0225-2023. Print 2024 Apr 30.
3
A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Self-Management Intervention for Improving Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Care in Greece.
希腊的一项慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理干预措施,旨在改善初级保健中的患者报告结局。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 23;60(3):377. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030377.
4
Intensive out-of-hospital coaching for frequently hospitalized COPD patients: a before-after feasibility study.对频繁住院的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行强化院外指导:一项前后对比的可行性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 17;10:1195481. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1195481. eCollection 2023.
5
Efficacy of interventions to alter measures of fat-free mass in people with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改变慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者去脂体重指标的干预措施的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
ERJ Open Res. 2023 Jul 31;9(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00102-2023. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Piloting an online telecoaching community-based exercise intervention with adults living with HIV: protocol for a mixed-methods implementation science study.为艾滋病毒感染者开展基于在线远程指导的社区锻炼干预措施的试点研究:一项混合方法实施科学研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 30;13(3):e067703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067703.
7
Physical activity promotion interventions in chronic airways disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体力活动促进干预在慢性气道疾病中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Jan 25;32(167). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0109-2022. Print 2023 Mar 31.
8
Embedding Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Home and Community Setting: A Rapid Review.将慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺康复融入家庭和社区环境:快速综述
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Mar 30;3:780736. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.780736. eCollection 2022.
9
A Comparison of Physical Activity Between Home-Based and Centre-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Randomised Controlled Secondary Analysis.居家与中心式肺康复的体力活动比较:一项随机对照二次分析
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Oct 26;2:743441. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.743441. eCollection 2021.
10
Self-management interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 10;1(1):CD002990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub4.