Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;59(3):493-502. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.09.017. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
A multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology company survey was conducted to gain a better understanding of the use and value of the tissue cross-reactivity (TCR) assay in the development of biotherapeutic molecules. The majority of the molecules did not use TCR data as the only basis for determining species selection for toxicity studies (73%). For 95% of the molecules, the TCR data had no impact on the development strategy. For 2% of the molecules (1/56), TCR data was the sole source of information indicating a potential risk to patients. Unexpected or off-target binding was seen with 35% of the molecules, with the majority of this binding occurring in the CNS and reproductive organs. Tissues that were known or presumed to contain the target stained positively in 22% and 10% of molecules tested in non-human primate and human tissues, respectively. Tissues that were known or presumed to lack the target were negative for staining in 39% and 50% of molecules for non-human primate and human tissue, respectively. For 5% (6/110) of all the molecules, companies stated that toxicities would have been missed in animal studies or the clinic (i.e., not identified by clinical signs, histopathology, etc.) if the TCR studies had not been performed.
一家跨国制药和生物技术公司进行了一项调查,以更好地了解组织交叉反应(TCR)测定在生物治疗分子开发中的使用和价值。大多数分子并没有将 TCR 数据作为唯一基础来确定毒性研究的物种选择(73%)。对于 95%的分子,TCR 数据对开发策略没有影响。对于 2%的分子(1/56),TCR 数据是唯一表明对患者有潜在风险的信息来源。35%的分子出现了意外或脱靶结合,大多数结合发生在中枢神经系统和生殖器官。在分别用非人类灵长类动物和人组织进行测试的 22%和 10%的分子中,已知或假定含有靶标的组织呈阳性染色。在非人类灵长类动物和人组织中,已知或假定缺乏靶标的组织的染色分别为 39%和 50%为阴性。对于 5%(6/110)的所有分子,公司表示,如果没有进行 TCR 研究,动物研究或临床研究(即,未通过临床症状、组织病理学等识别)可能会错过毒性。