Suppr超能文献

经典与新兴方法评估单抗和类单抗分子的交叉反应性 - 对 2008-2019 年行业的调查。

Classic and evolving approaches to evaluating cross reactivity of mAb and mAb-like molecules - A survey of industry 2008-2019.

机构信息

Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, 01239, USA.

Charles River Laboratories, 15 Worman's Mill Court, Suite I, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;121:104872. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104872. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and mAb derivatives have become mainstay pharmaceutical modalites. A critical assessment is to ascertain the specificity of these molecules prior to human clinical trials. The primary technique for determining specificity has been the immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based "Tissue Cross-Reactivity" (TCR) assay, where the candidate molecule is applied to > 30 tissues to look for unexpected staining. In the last few years, however, non-IHC array-based platforms have emerged that allow for screening 75-80% of the human membrane proteome, indicating a viable alternative and/or addition to the IHC methods. The preclinical sciences subcommittee of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), "BioSafe", conducted a survey of 26 BIO member companies to understand current sponsor experience with the IHC and array techniques. In the last ten years, respondents noted they have conducted more than 650 IHC TCR assays, largely on full length mAbs, with varying impacts on programs. Protein/cell arrays have been utilized by almost half of the companies and sponsors are gaining familiarity and comfort with the platform. Initial experience with recent versions of these arrays has been largely positive. While most sponsors are not prepared to eliminate the IHC TCR assay, growing experience with these alternatives allows them to confidently choose other approaches with or without TCR assays.

摘要

单克隆抗体(mAbs)及其衍生物已成为主要的药物模式。在进行人体临床试验之前,需要对这些分子的特异性进行严格评估。确定特异性的主要技术是基于免疫组织化学(IHC)的“组织交叉反应性”(TCR)检测,其中候选分子应用于> 30 种组织,以寻找意外的染色。然而,在过去几年中,出现了非 IHC 基于阵列的平台,可用于筛选 75-80%的人类膜蛋白组,为 IHC 方法提供了可行的替代方法和/或补充。生物技术创新组织(BIO)的临床前科学小组委员会“BioSafe”对 26 家 BIO 成员公司进行了调查,以了解赞助商目前在 IHC 和阵列技术方面的经验。在过去十年中,受访者指出他们已经进行了超过 650 次 IHC TCR 检测,主要针对全长 mAbs,对项目有不同的影响。近一半的公司都使用了蛋白质/细胞阵列,赞助商对该平台的熟悉度和舒适度也在逐渐提高。对这些阵列最新版本的初步经验大多是积极的。虽然大多数赞助商不准备淘汰 IHC TCR 检测,但对这些替代方法的不断增加的经验使他们能够有信心选择其他方法,无论是否进行 TCR 检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验