Ophthalmology Department, Chhatrapati Sahuji Maharaj Medical University, India.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov-Dec;58(6):537-40. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.71713.
A prospective comparative study was undertaken to compare the patients' pain experience, surgical outcome and surgeon's experience in phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) under topical anesthesia supplemented with intracameral lignocaine (TASIL). In Group 1 (n=88) phacoemulsification was done and in Group 2 (n=92) MSICS was done. Pain scores were marked by the patients on a Visual analog scale (VAS) after the surgery. The surgical experience was noted on a questionnaire by the operating surgeon. Descriptive analysis and one-tailed Mann-Whitney test were used to draw results. The average VAS score in Group 1 was 0.65 (SD 1.31) and in Group 2 it was 0.90 (SD 1.22). This difference in the average was not statistically significant with P=0.09. The study demonstrates that MSICS and phacoemulsification both can be done safely under TASIL with acceptable patient comfort, and the pain experienced by the patients during the procedures is comparable.
一项前瞻性对比研究旨在比较在局部麻醉下补充眼内利多卡因(TASIL)进行超声乳化白内障吸除术和手动小切口白内障手术(MSICS)的患者疼痛体验、手术结果和外科医生的经验。在第 1 组(n=88)中进行超声乳化白内障吸除术,在第 2 组(n=92)中进行 MSICS。手术后患者通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)标记疼痛评分。手术医生通过问卷调查记录手术经验。使用描述性分析和单尾曼-惠特尼检验得出结果。第 1 组的平均 VAS 评分为 0.65(SD 1.31),第 2 组为 0.90(SD 1.22)。平均差异无统计学意义(P=0.09)。该研究表明,在 TASIL 下,MSICS 和超声乳化白内障吸除术都可以安全进行,患者舒适度可接受,且患者在手术过程中经历的疼痛相当。